Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLINE FOSTER Board President
ANNA MCILWAIN VICE PRESIDE
MELISSA SCHNOOR Treasurer
ALICE KATE BERRY Secretary

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM MONSON Board President
MEG FOSTER VICE PRESIDE
MELISSA SCHNOOR Treasurer
ALICE KATE BERRY Secretary
RACHAEL ASHBAKER Board Member
FELICIA BUSBY Board Member
AMY CHENOWETH Board Member
DYLAN DEMOUEY Board Member
KELLY FOSTER Board Member
JENNYE HEIDELBERG Board Member
KATIE HINKEL Board Member
GINA JORDAN Board Member
ROGENA MITCHELL Board Member
ERICA PEYTON Board Member
CAYLA SWITZER Board Member
ABBY WILLS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM MONSON Board President
MEG FOSTER VICE PRESIDE
MELISSA SCHNOOR Treasurer
ALICE KATE BERRY Secretary
DYLAN DEMOUEY Board Member
FELICIA BUSBY Board Member
KELLY FOSTER Board Member
JENNYE HEIDELBERG Board Member
ROGENA MITCHELL Board Member
KATIE HINKEL Board Member
GINA JORDAN Board Member
ERICA PEYTON Board Member
ABBY WILLS Board Member
CAYLA SWITZER Board Member
AMY CHENOWETH Board Member
RACHAEL ASHBAKER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM MONSON Board President
MEG FOSTER VICE PRESIDE
MELISSA SCHNOOR Treasurer
ALICE KATE BERRY Secretary
DYLAN DEMOUEY Board Member
FELICIA BUSBY Board Member
KELLY FOSTER Board Member
JENNYE HEIDELBERG Board Member
ROGENA MITCHELL Board Member
KATIE HINKEL Board Member
GINA JORDAN Board Member
ERICA PEYTON Board Member
ABBY WILLS Board Member
CAYLA SWITZER Board Member
AMY CHENOWETH Board Member
RACHAEL ASHBAKER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM MONSON Board President
MEG FOSTER VICE PRESIDE
MELISSA SCHNOOR Treasurer
ALICE KATE BERRY Secretary
DYLAN DEMOUEY Board Member
FELICIA BUSBY Board Member
KELLY FOSTER Board Member
JENNYE HEIDELBERG Board Member
ROGENA MITCHELL Board Member
KATIE HINKEL Board Member
GINA JORDAN Board Member
ERICA PEYTON Board Member
ABBY WILLS Board Member
CAYLA SWITZER Board Member
AMY CHENOWETH Board Member
RACHAEL ASHBAKER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 29 other orgs in MS with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points above the peer median (65 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.