Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
23
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 39.1% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 41 Fragile Recovery
2021 37.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 35.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 37.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mary Elizabeth Everett Artistic Director 28.5% of Rev
Rachel Landrum Executive Director 10.6% of Rev
Renee Murray Chairman
Joshua Smith Immediate Past Chairman
Amanda Wilson Treasurer
Alison Waite Secretary
Paul Bowden Board Member
Frank Fillingham Board Member
Judith Gearhart Board Member
Marvin Milner Board Member
Kim Pigott Board Member
Charlotte Steele Board Member
Mariah Taylor Board Member
John Waite Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nathan J Hettinger Artistic Director 23.2% of Rev
Rachel Landrum Executive Director 7.9% of Rev
Josh Smith Chairman
Christy Soloveichik Immediate Past Chairman
Amanda Wilson Treasurer
Renee Murray Secretary
Paul Bowden Board Member
William Bruce Board Member
Judith Gearhart Board Member
Mary Hauch Board Member
Sandy McKellar Board Member
Zachary Thaggard Board Member
Joseph Tornabene Board Member
Alison Waite Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mark Nabholz Artistic Director 25.3% of Rev
Leanna Range-Norwood Executive Director 15.2% of Rev
Sherry Boyer Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
Josh Smith Chairman
Christy Soloveichik Immediate Past Chairman
Amanda Wilsom Treasurer
Stephen Travers Secretary
Sara Christy Board Member
Nora Katz Board Member
Meryl Franck Board Member
Wren Gregory Board Member
Sylvia Napper Board Member
Ethan Martin Board Member
Zachary Thaggard Board Member
Joseph Tornabene Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mark Nabholz Artistic Director 25.3% of Rev
Sherry Boyer Executive Director 18.2% of Rev
Zachary Thaggard Board Member
Joseph Tornabene Board Member
Josh Smith Chairman
Christy Soloveichik Immediate Past Chairman
Amanda Wilsom Treasurer
Victor LaGarde Board Member
Stephen Travers Secretary
Sara Christy Board Member
Nora Katz Board Member
Meryl Franck Board Member
Wren Gregory Board Member
Sylvia Napper Board Member
Ethan Martin Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 29 other orgs in MS with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (15 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 39.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~34 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.