Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 3.1% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 2.3% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 2.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 2.8% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 5.2% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 3.2% 45 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 3.6% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 4.5% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 3.6% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 3.5% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 1.1% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 1.9% 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEN STEORTS Board President 2.7% of Rev
PAULA BEASLEY Board President
MICHAEL COOPER Board Member
JOHN DUDAS Board Member
LEE GIBSON Board Member
CAMERON HARVEY Board Member
STEVE MCINTYRE Board Member
WILL NORRIS Secretary
TINA TILTON Board Member
SHEILA WHALUM Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAULA BEASLEY Board President
MICHAEL COOPER Board Member
JOHN DUDAS Board Member
LEE GIBSON Board Member
SARAH HAIZLIP Board Member
CAMERON HARVEY Board Member
JOY JOHNSON Board Member
STEVE MCINTYRE Board Member
WILL NORRIS Secretary
SHEILA WHALUM Board Member
KEN STEORTS Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEN STEORTS Board President 2.7% of Rev
PAULA BEASLEY Board President
JOHN DUDAS Board Member
LEE GIBSON Board Member
KRISTIAN GLUCK Treasurer
SARAH HAIZLIP Board Member
CAMERON HARVEY Board Member
CHARLES LAWING Board Member
ELIOT MORRIS Board Member
CLAY MCCORMACK Board Member
STEVE MCINTYRE Board Member
WILL NORRIS Secretary
JOEL ONESIMUS Board Member
MIKE OVERLIN Board Member
SUSAN PATTERSON Board Member
DAVE PRINCE Board Member
SHEILA WHALUM Board Member
GINGER WHITEHORN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAULA BEASLEY Board Member
MICHAEL CROSS Board Member
JOHN DUDAS Board Member
ALISON FRANKLIN Board Member
LEE GIBSON Board Member
KRISTIAN GLUCK Treasurer
SARAH HAIZLIP Board President
CHARLES LAWING Board Member
DR STEVE MARODA Board Member
ELIOT MORRIS Board President
CLAY MCCORMACK Board Member
MIKE OVERLIN Board Member
SUSAN PATTERSON Board Member
DAVE PRINCE Board Member
SHEILA WHALUM Secretary
KEN STEORTS Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 12,541 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix B2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.