Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
25
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.7% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 20.3% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 10.0% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 — — 8.6% 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shermona Mitchell Artistic Director 13.3% of Rev
Teresa Thuman Artistic Director 12.0% of Rev
Sydney Maltese Board President —
Aaron Pitre Board President —
Lindsey O'Connor Treasurer —
Sameer Arshad Secretary —
Hisam Goueli Board Member —
Andrea Kovich Board Member —
David Tierney Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Teresa Thuman Executive Director 13.8% of Rev
Shermona Mitchell Board President —
Andrea Kovich Board President —
Rebecca Alhadeff Secretary —
Lucas Fletcher Treasurer —
Stan Friedlander Board Member —
Alysha Curry Board Member —
Kara Brown Board Member —
Ana Maria Campoy Board Member —
Mario Gomez Board Member —
Syndey Maltese Board Member —
Parmida Ziaei Board Member —
Brandon Jones Mooney Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Teresa Thuman Artistic Director 9.0% of Rev
Patrick Lennon Board Member —
Nathan Reeves Board Member —
Lucas Fletcher Treasurer —
Stan Friedlander Board Member —
Shermona Mitchell Board President —
Andrea Kovich Board President —
Alysha Curry Brown Board Member —
Kara Brown Board Member —
Brandon Jones Mooney Board Member —
Ana Maria Campoy Board Member —
Rebecca Alhadeff Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Teresa Thuman Artistic Director 6.1% of Rev
Nathan Reeves Board President —
Lucas Fletcher Treasurer —
Stan Friedlander Board Member —
Shermona Mitchell Board Member —
Rebecca Alhadeff Board Member —
Andrea Kovich Board Member —
Alysha Curry Brown Board Member —
Kara Brown Board Member —
Gurvinder Pal Singh Board Member —
Christina Lee Board Member —
Ann McCurdy Secretary —
Patrick Lennon Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.