Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 5.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 5.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TOM BOUSSARD Board President
MIKE COWLES Board President
BARBIE TATMAN Secretary
STEVE WHEELER Treasurer
MARY JANE ROTELLAR Board Member
DAVID CIOCHETTY Board Member
JOE DAVIS Board Member
LARNELLE HARRIS Board Member
BUD LAYNE Board Member
LIZ NELSON Board Member
GARY RALEY Board Member
THAD CONNALLY III Board Member
ANTHONY NORMAN Board Member
D GAINES PENN Board Member
STEVE THURMOND Board Member
BILLY DUVALL Board Member
LESLIE TUTT KERRICK Board Member
SHARON MUTTER Board Member
RITA SCOTT Board Member
MARY VITALE Board Member
MANDY HICKS Board Member
JULIE WEDGE Board Member
LORA PATTON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 56 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (0 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 32 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.