Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 52 Fragile Recovery
2013 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN HIGH Executive Director 12.1% of Rev
ANDY A JHANJI Board Member
CYNTHIA L PETERSON Board Member
DEBRA J SHORT Board Member
DENNIS W ARCHER Board Member
DR LARRY A WICKLESS Board Member
DR LISA MERRITT Board Member
E MARIE MCKEE Board Member
EDWARD M SWAN JR CFA Board Member
ELLEN S BERMAN Board Member
H MICHAEL BUSH Treasurer
JAMES A JOSEPH Board Member
JAMES B STEWART Board Member
JANICE TIBBALS Board Member
JAVI SUAREZ Board Member
JEFFREY R HOTCHKISS Board President
JOAN URANGA Board Member
JUDITH F SHANK Secretary
KELLY A ROMANOFF Board Member
KIRK KE WANG Board Member
LEON R ELLIN Board Member
LESLIE V PANTIN Board Member
MARAGART A ROLANDO Board Member
MARGARET D HAUSBERG Board Member
MAYRA NUIBO SCHMIDT Board Member
MERCEDES SOLER-MARTINEZ Board Member
NANCY KOTLER Board Member
REBECCA DONELSON Board Member
ROBERT D HUNTER Board Member
SARAH H PAPPAS Board Member
THOMAS F ICARD JR Board Member
TINA SHAO NAPOLI Board Member
WARREN R COLBERT SR Board President
JEAN EVANS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN HIGH Executive Director 12.2% of Rev
JENNIFER PRICE Board Member 4.4% of Rev
H MICHAEL BUSH Board Member
JUDITH F SHANK Secretary
SARAH H PAPPAS Board President
JEFFREY R HOTCHKISS Board President
ELLEN S BERMAN Board Member
REBECCA DONELSON Board Member
MARGARET D HAUSBERG Board Member
DENNIS W ARCHER Board Member
LEON R ELLIN Board Member
DARREL E FLANEL Board Member
CYNTHIA L PETERSON Board Member
ROBERT D HUNTER Board Member
THOMAS F ICARD JR Board Member
LESLIE V PANTIN Board Member
KELLY A ROMANOFF Board Member
AMBASSADOR JAMES A JOSEPH Board Member
NANCY KOTLER Board Member
DEBRA J SHORT Board Member
WARREN R COLBERT SR Board Member
DR LISA MERRITT Board Member
TINA SHAO NAPOLI Board Member
MARAGART A ROLANDO Board Member
MAYRA N SCHMIDT Board Member
MICHAEL A KALMAN Board Member
JAVI SUAREZ Board Member
EDWARD M SWAN JR CFA Treasurer
HOWARD C TIBBALS Board Member
DR LARRY A WICKLESS Board Member
LESLIE YOUNG Board Member
MERCEDES SOLER-MARTINEZ Board Member
JOAN URANGA Board Member
KIRK KE WANG Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 18 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 23 points above the peer median (60 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 52 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.