Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
36
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 9.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 9.8% 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 12.2% 39 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 7.5% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 7.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 6.5% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 7.6% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — 7.8% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — 5.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 6.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — 9.2% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 10.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAILEY KLOPFENSTEIN Executive Director 11.3% of Rev
VASILE PETRUTIU Board Member 9.8% of Rev
TERI YANOVITCH Board President —
KARL CORBRAY Board President —
IMRE SZABO Treasurer —
NICHOLE GORDON Secretary —
JOSE GARRIDO Board Member —
VICTORIA MARSHALL Board Member —
DAWN NAATJES Board Member —
VAN-TAM NGUYEN Board Member —
LOUIS SUPOWITZ Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAILEY KLOPFENSTEIN Executive Director 11.6% of Rev
VAN-TAM NGUYEN Board President —
TERI YANOVITCH Board President —
VICTORIA MARSHALL Treasurer —
KARL CORBRAY Secretary —
TRACY COOK-COOMBE Board Member —
JOSE GARRIDO Board Member —
NICHOLE GORDON Board Member —
DAWN NAATJES Board Member —
VASILE PETRUTIU Board Member —
DANIELLE STOKES Board Member —
LOUIS SUPOWITZ Board Member —
IMRE SZABO Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VASILE PETRUTIU Executive Director 9.9% of Rev
KARL CORBRAY Secretary —
VAN-TAM NGUYEN Board Member —
TERI YANOVITCH Board President —
DANIELLE STOKES Board President —
LOUIS SUPOWITZ Board Member —
JOSE GARRIDO Treasurer —
NICHOLE GORDON Board Member —
LORA COULTER Board Member —
DAWN NAATJES Board Member —
TRACY COOK-COOMBE Board Member —
JOSEPH HOUSE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VASILE PETRUTIU Board Member 7.7% of Rev
KARL CORBRAY Board President —
VAN-TAM NGUYEN VICE PRESIDE —
TERI YANOVITCH Treasurer —
DANIELLE STOKES Secretary —
LOUIS SUPOWITZ Board Member —
JOSE GARRIDO Board Member —
NICHOLE GORDON Board Member —
LORA COULTER Board Member —
DAWN NAATJES Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 477 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 49 points below the peer median (5 vs. 54).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.