Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 48 Fragile Recovery
2016 42 Fragile Recovery
2015 3.7% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 18.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 15.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 13.4% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETTY BERLING VICE PRESIDE
RUSSELL RUSTY BRANCH Board Member
LINDA BRENT-BARADON PAST PRESIDE
MEG BURKE Board Member
KARLA ENT Board Member
PRESTON MURPHY Board Member
ROBERT RUSHING Board Member
ALEJANDRA RYAN Board Member
JIMMY STAPLETON Treasurer
SHEILA DUNN Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETTY BERLING VICE PRESIDE
LINDA BRENT-BARADON PAST PRESIDE
DR NICKLAUS HEATH DDS Board Member
SHEILA DUNN Board Member
LORIE KOMANOVA Board Member
GLEN MILEY Board Member
PRESTON MURPHY Board Member
ROBERT RUSHING Board Member
JIMMY STAPLETON Treasurer
JERRY UNRUH Board President
KIM DAY Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 44 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.