Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 11.7% 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 20.1% 50 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 34.4% 39 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 7.7% 53 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 12.9% 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Sullivan Executive Director 13.7% of Rev
Jennifer Sullivan Executive Director 11.7% of Rev
Laura Allgood Board Member —
Sherry St Petery Board Member —
Jacob Reedy Board Member —
Madison Kerr Board Member —
Christine Marr Board Member —
Jessica Gronberg Board Member —
Dan Browne Board Member —
Meghan Alfaro Board President —
Joani Slawson Board President —
Ashley Peek Board President —
Laura Allgood Board Member —
Sherry St Petery Board Member —
Jacob Reedy Board Member —
Madison Schafer Board Member —
Shannon Stem Board Member —
Dorothy Yorty Board Member —
Jessica Gronberg Board Member —
Christine Marr Board Member —
Meghan Alfaro Board President —
Joani Slawson Board President —
Ashley Peek Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Sullivan Executive Director 11.7% of Rev
Jennifer Sullivan Executive Director 11.7% of Rev
Laura Allgood Board Member —
Sherry St Petery Board Member —
Jacob Reedy Board Member —
Madison Schafer Board Member —
Meghan Alfaro Board Member —
Dorothy Yorty Board Member —
Pauline Latorre Board Member —
Ernesta Chicklowshi Board President —
Joani Slawson Board President —
Ashley Peek Board President —
Laura Allgood Board Member —
Sherry St Petery Board Member —
Jacob Reedy Board Member —
Madison Schafer Board Member —
Meghan Alfaro Board Member —
Shannon Stem Board Member —
Dorothy Yorty Board Member —
Pauline Latorre Board Member —
Ernesta Chicklowshi Board President —
Joani Slawson Board President —
Ashley Peek Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Sullivan Executive Director 8.8% of Rev
Rosemary Pilonero Board President —
Ernesta Chicklowski Board President —
Joani Slawson Board President —
Meghan Alfaro Board Member —
Sydney Miller Board Member —
Shannon Stem Board Member —
Luis Rios Board Member —
Dorothy Yorty Board Member —
Pauline LaTorre Board Member —
Jacob Reedy Board Member —
Sherry St Petery Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Sullivan Executive Director 11.7% of Rev
Rosemary Pilonero Board President —
Ernesta Chicklowski Board President —
Joani Slawson Board President —
Meghan Alfaro Board Member —
Sydney Johnson Board Member —
Jenny Chambless Board Member —
Shannon Stem Board Member —
Lesleigh Howard-Zeno Board Member —
Luis Rios Board Member —
Dorothy Yorty Board Member —
Pauline Latorre Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 477 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (50 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.