Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 11.0% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 12.1% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 14.0% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 21.8% 37 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 18.2% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 15.7% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 14.8% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 9.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 6.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 12.1% 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 15.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAIRIKA CORNETT EXECUTIVE DI 13.3% of Rev
AMY SCOTT Board Member —
MARY STANFORD Board Member —
KRIS WAYNE Board Member —
DAVID BARNETT Board Member —
MICHAEL CALLAHAN Board Member —
DOUG CARTER Board Member —
NATALIE CHALLEN Board President —
KATE COOK Board Member —
JIM ECK Board Member —
LYDIA FERGUSON Secretary —
FRAN HABEEB Board Member —
JANE HEMMER Board Member —
GAIL HOUGH Board Member —
JILL MANSFIELD Board Member —
SCOTT MCLENDON Board Member —
PETE MILLER Board President —
ANN NIXON Board President —
LEIGH-ANNE O'BRIAN Board Member —
TYLER PUCKETT Board Member —
ED SCHRADER Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAIRIKA CORNETT Executive Director 9.4% of Rev
BETSY ADAMS Board Member —
LEIGH ANN O' BRIEN Board Member —
MICHAEL CALLAHAN Board Member —
NATALIE CHALLEN Treasurer —
CAROL ANN DANIEL Board Member —
JIM ECK Board Member —
JANE HEMMER Board Member —
PAULA HOFFMAN Board Member —
JOYCE HORNOR Board President —
LAURA LUKERT Board Member —
JILL MANSFIELD Board Member —
SCOTT MCLENDON Board Member —
PETE MILLER Board Member —
CAROLINE NIX Board Member —
ANN NIXON Board President —
JEFF PAYNE Board Member —
MARY STANFORD Secretary —
CARLA WALKER Board Member —
AMANDA WILLIS Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAIRIKA CORNETT Executive Director 8.7% of Rev
BETSY ADAMS Board Member —
LEIGH ANN O' BRIEN Secretary —
NATALIE CHALLEN Board Member —
CAROL ANN DANIEL Board Member —
JULIA GREENE PAST PRESIDE —
PAULA HOFFMAN Board Member —
JOYCE HORNOR VICE PRESIDE —
FRED KELLY Treasurer —
JILL MANSFIELD Board Member —
PETE MILLER Board Member —
ANN NIX Board Member —
CAROLINE NIX Board Member —
JEFF PAYNE Board Member —
TYLER SMITH Board Member —
MARY STANFORD Board Member —
AMANDA WILLIS Board President —
CINDY WILSON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAIRIKA CORNETT Executive Director 8.5% of Rev
TYLER SMITH Board Member —
AMANDA WILLIS VICE PRESIDE —
CINDY WILSON Board Member —
BETSY ADAMS PAST PRESIDE —
ANN ALEXANDER Board Member —
CAROL ATTRIDGE Board Member —
LEIGH ANN O' BRIEN Secretary —
NATALIE CHALLEN Board Member —
CAROL ANN DANIEL Board Member —
JULIA GREENE Board President —
ANNE BRODIE HILL Board Member —
PAULA HOFFMAN Board Member —
JOYCE HORNOR Board Member —
FRED KELLY Treasurer —
ROBYN LYNCH Board Member —
JILL MANSFIELD Board Member —
PETE MILLER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 37 points above the peer median (60 vs. 23).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.