Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | 14.6% | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 10.2% | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Hardy | Artistic Director | 7.3% of Rev | ||
| Jennifer Kimball | Board Member | 7.3% of Rev | ||
| C E Patten II | Board Member | — | ||
| Audrey Galex | Board President | — | ||
| Jane Zoellick | Board President | — | ||
| Cynthia Webb | Secretary | — | ||
| Kelli Spencer | Board Member | — | ||
| Ryan Daniels | Treasurer | — | ||
| Oliver tum Suden | Secretary | — | ||
| Jeanine Botwe-Brown | Board Member | — | ||
| Marcie Dickson | Board Member | — | ||
| Vanessa Mazabane | Board Member | — | ||
| Micheal Stoots | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Kimball | Board Member | 3.2% of Rev | ||
| Peter Hardy | Artistic Director | 3.0% of Rev | ||
| Alissa Scherb | Treasurer | — | ||
| Edward Henderson II | Board Member | — | ||
| C E Patten II | Board President | — | ||
| Audrey Galex | Board President | — | ||
| Jane Zoellick | Secretary | — | ||
| Cynthia Webb | Secretary | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 123 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points below the peer median (15 vs. 30).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 14.6% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.