Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 2.7% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 3.5% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 4.3% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 2.5% 41 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 — — 3.8% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 4.3% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — 5.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 5.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 5.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 6.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 6.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ Board President 2.2% of Rev
ANN-CAROL PENCE VICE PRESIDE 1.8% of Rev
LISA ANDERS Board Member —
MARSHALL BOUTWELL Board Member —
GENE BYCE Board Member —
DR VALERIE CLARK Board Member —
JAY DENNARD Board Member —
RANDY FOSTER VICE CHARIMA —
MELODY GLOUTEN Secretary —
NICOLE HENDRICKSON Board Member —
DR LAURA HOLLAND Treasurer —
DOUG HOOKER Board Member —
DR DAN KAUFMAN Board Member —
SANTIAGO MARQUEZ Board Member —
GLENN MARTIN Board Member —
LESLIE MORGAN Board Member —
JESSICA RANTAMAKI Board Member —
CHUCK WARBINGTON Board Member —
DAVID WELDEN BOARD PRESID —
MARY JANE WOLFE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHUCK WARBINGTON Board Member —
DAVID WELDEN BOARD PRESID —
MARY JANE WOLFE Board Member —
LISA ANDERS Board Member —
MARSHALL BOUTWELL Board Member —
GENE BYCE Board Member —
DR VALERIE CLARK Board Member —
JAY DENNARD Board Member —
RANDY FOSTER VICE CHARIMA —
MELODY GLOUTEN Secretary —
NICOLE HENDRICKSON Board Member —
DR LAURA HOLLAND Treasurer —
DOUG HOOKER Board Member —
DR DAN KAUFMAN Board Member —
SANTIAGO MARQUEZ Board Member —
GLENN MARTIN Board Member —
LESLIE MORGAN Board Member —
ANN-CAROL PENCE VICE PRESIDE —
JESSICA RANTAMAKI Board Member —
ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANN-CAROL PENCE VICE PRESIDE 1.5% of Rev
ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ Board President 1.5% of Rev
LISA ANDERS Board Member —
MARSHALL BOUTWELL Board Member —
GENE BYCE Board Member —
DR VALERIE CLARK Board Member —
JAY DENNARD Board Member —
RANDY FOSTER VICE CHARIMA —
MELODY GLOUTEN Secretary —
NICOLE HENDRICKSON Board Member —
DR LAURA HOLLAND Treasurer —
DOUG HOOKER Board Member —
DR DAN KAUFMAN Board Member —
SANTIAGO MARQUEZ Board Member —
GLENN MARTIN Board Member —
LESLIE MORGAN Board Member —
JESSICA RANTAMAKI Board Member —
CHUCK WARBINGTON Board Member —
DAVID WELDEN BOARD PRESID —
MARY JANE WOLFE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 209 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points below the peer median (0 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 35 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.