Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
33
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 57.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 65 Stable Stable Watch
2011 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mary Greenwood Executive Director 57.3% of Rev
Margaret Looney Board President
Theresa Bradley Board President
Ellen Best Treasurer
Monica Sangman Secretary
Elizabeth Ann Dalton Board Member
Tim Ford Board Member
Shelia Ford Board Member
Dianne Leonhardt Board Member
Nancy King Board Member
Susan Maxon Board Member
Amanda Meyer Board Member
Jennifer Patterson Board Member
Janet Spaulding Board Member
Tina Board Member
Chris Wages Board Member
Diane Coward Board Member
Alina Zingleman Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mary Greenwood Executive Director 57.7% of Rev
Margaret Looney Board President
Theresa Bradley Board President
Alina Zingleman Treasurer
Monica Sangman Secretary
Elizabeth Ann Dalton Board Member
Tim Ford Board Member
Shelia Ford Board Member
Dianne Leonhardt Board Member
Nancy King Board Member
Susan Maxon Board Member
Amanda Meyers Board Member
Jennifer Patterson Board Member
Janet Spaulding Board Member
Tina Board Member
Chris Wages Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN MCDOWELL PAST PRESIDE
ROBIN CORRENTI Treasurer
GINNY GREENWOOD Board Member
NANCY YANCEY Board Member
PEPPER PETTIT Board Member
ANN BRASWELL Board Member
JANE WILSON Board Member
SUE WELLS Secretary
JIM ATWOOD Board Member
JENNY SCHNEIDER Board Member
SHIRLEY HAWKINS Board President
JIM EATON Board President
SAMANTHA HEWITT Board Member
MARIANA STONE Board Member
NANCY SHAFFMAN Board Member
JIM BAILEY Board Member
CARLA BOUTIN Board Member
JIM EATON Board President
SHIRLEY HAWKINS Board President
DIANE COWART Board Member
JOANNE CULLITY Board Member
MARGARET LOONEY Board Member
NANCY KING Board Member
DIANNE LEONHARDT Board Member
TINA SANT Board Member
CHRIS WAGES Board Member
ELIZABETH ANN DALTON Board President
JANET SPAULDING Board Member
ROBIN CORRENTI Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM EATON Board President
SHIRLEY HAWKINS Board President
JIM BAILEY Treasurer
SUE WELLS Secretary
JIM ATWOOD Board Member
ANN BRASWELL Board Member
JENNY SCHNEIDER Board Member
STACI SCHAFFMAN Board Member
DIANE COWART Board Member
ALLIE DEAN Board Member
DIANE HOUSER Board Member
MARGARET LOONEY Board Member
SAMANTHA HEWLETT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in GA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 57.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.