Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | 1.2% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 59 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 56 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 56 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOSEPH BLAKE EVANS | Board President | — | ||
| MARK FORD | Board President | — | ||
| LINDA SAINATO | CHAIRMAN | — | ||
| STACEY SMITH | Treasurer | — | ||
| JANE WELDON | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOSEPH BLAKE EVANS | CHAIRMAN | — | ||
| MARK FORD | Board President | — | ||
| LINDA SAINATO | Secretary | — | ||
| KYLE SMITH | PAST CHAIRMA | — | ||
| STACEY SMITH | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUCIA EASTHAM | Treasurer | — | ||
| JOSEPH BLAKE EVANS | CHAIRMAN | — | ||
| MARK FORD | Board President | — | ||
| KYLE SMITH | PAST CHAIRMA | — | ||
| PAM STEPHENS | Secretary | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 124 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 56 → 55 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 1.2% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.