Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 4.6% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 5.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 2.9% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 4.7% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 7.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 9.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 10.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anita Allen Farley Artistic Director 5.2% of Rev
Katie Parvis Board President
Justin Anderson Treasurer
Hans Appen Board Member
Robert Hagan Board Member
Heather McKinley Board Member
Paul Brown Board Member
Taryn Janelle Board Member
Kate Daniels Board Member
Sandy Newton Board Member
Jonathan Wood Board Member
Jeffrey Fischer Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANITA ALLEN-FARLEY ProducingDIRECT 9.5% of Rev
ANITA ALLEN-FARLEY ProducingDIRECT 4.5% of Rev
ROBIN MONDCRIEF IVES Board President
TOM DAVIS Treasurer
KATIE IVES Secretary
HANS APPEN Board Member
CARLA CROWELL Board Member
ROBERT HAGAN Board Member
GISELLE HOLLOWAY Board Member
BARBARA LOVATT Board Member
HEATHER MCKINLEY Board Member
KATIE PARVIS Board Member
AMY GATES STROUD Board Member
LISA TILT Board Member
CLAUDIA WOOD Board Member
JANET KINCAID Board President
ROBIN MONDCRIEF IVES Board President
TOM DAVIS Treasurer
ASHLEY CURLING Secretary
HANS APPEN Board Member
MICHAEL BURNS Board Member
CARLA CROWELL Board Member
ROBERT HAGAN Board Member
GISELLE HOLLOWAY Board Member
KARA JACKSON Board Member
BARBARA LOVATT Board Member
HEATHER MCKINLEY Board Member
KATIE PARVIS Board Member
AMY GATES STROUD Board Member
LISA TILT Board Member
CLAUDIA WOOD Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANITA ALLEN-FARLEY ProducingDIRECT 14.3% of Rev
HEATHER MCKINLEY Board Member
JANET KINCAID Board President
HANS APPEN Board Member
ASHLEY CURLING Secretary
ROBIN IVES Board President
ROBERT HAGAN Board President
CARLA CROWELL Board Member
KATIE PARVIS Board Member
AMY GATES STROUD Board Member
TOM DAVIS Treasurer
BARBARA LOVATT Board Member
LISA TILT Board Member
CLAUDIA WOOD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 123 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (0 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.