Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 65 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 65 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 60 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 60 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANDI PARRISH | Board Member | — | ||
| PATTI COOK ROBERTSON | Board President | — | ||
| TASHA CONRAD | Treasurer | — | ||
| ALAN SANDERSON | Board Member | — | ||
| JOHNATHAN COOKS | Board Member | — | ||
| JEANNIE GUPTON | Board Member | — | ||
| BROCK GILLIARD | Board Member | — | ||
| JUNE BELL | Secretary | — | ||
| BEN HAWLEY | VICE PRESIDE | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANDI PARRISH | Board Member | — | ||
| PATTI COOK ROBERTSON | Board President | — | ||
| LU WILLIAMS | Treasurer | — | ||
| MARY ANN GREEN | Board Member | — | ||
| JOHNATHAN COOKS | Board Member | — | ||
| JEANNIE GUPTON | Board Member | — | ||
| BROCK GILLIARD | Board Member | — | ||
| JUNE BELL | Secretary | — | ||
| MICAIAH BARAJAS | VICE PRESIDE | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 123 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 64 points above the peer median (100 vs. 36).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 60 → 65 over 5 years (improving by 5 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.