Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 17.0% 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 20.6% 47 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 13.5% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 26.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 16.2% 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 20.2% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 19.3% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 17.9% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — 18.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — 17.6% 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 15.3% 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 20.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — 16.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shearra Miller Executive Direc 16.3% of Rev
Dr Kendalyn Lutz-Craver Board President —
Dr Dustin Bridges Chairman —
Erin Borders Treasurer —
Lynn Carter Secretary —
Noel Manning Board Member —
Chris Gash Board Member —
Emily Crocker-Underwood Board Member —
Kay Young Board Member —
Susan Jones Board Member —
Adam Nestlerode Board Member —
Misti Merritt Board Member —
Hal Dedmond Board Member —
Michael Harden Board President —
Kitty Hoyle Board Member —
Dr Brian Hunnell Board Member —
Bill McCarter Board Member —
Patrick McMurry Board Member —
Omar Porter Board Member —
LaSundra Williams Board Member —
Emily Yelton Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shearra Miller Executive Direc 16.2% of Rev
Dr Kendalyn Lutz-Craver Board President —
Dr Dustin Bridges Chairman —
Erin Borders Treasurer —
Lynn Carter Secretary —
Noel Manning Board Member —
Chris Gash Board Member —
Emily Crocker-Underwood Board Member —
Kay Young Board Member —
Susan Jones Board Member —
Adam Nestlerode Board Member —
Misti Merritt Board Member —
Hal Dedmond Board Member —
Michael Harden Board President —
Kitty Hoyle Board Member —
Dr Brian Hunnell Board Member —
Bill McCarter Board Member —
Patrick McMurry Board Member —
Omar Porter Board Member —
LaSundra Williams Board Member —
Emily Yelton Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shearra Miller Executive Direc 16.0% of Rev
Dr Kendalyn Lutz-Craver Chairman —
Dr Dustin Bridges Vice-Chairman —
Erin Borders Treasurer —
Lynn Carter Secretary —
Noel Manning Board President —
David Cline Board Member —
Emily Crocker-Underwood Board Member —
Kay Young Board Member —
Wanda Ware Secretary —
Violet Arth Dukes Marketing Direc —
Sarah Rochester Board Member —
Hal Dedmond Board Member —
Michael Harden Board Member —
Kitty Hoyle Board Member —
Dr Brian Hunnell Board Member —
Bill McCarter Board Member —
Patrick McMurry Board Member —
Omar Porter Board Member —
Lucas Shires Board Member —
Joe Suttle Board Member —
Emily Yelton Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 222 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (45 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 51 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.