Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
24
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 18.1% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 21.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 24.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 13.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAULA FOGARTY Executive Dir. 17.7% of Rev
DAVID ALTSCHILLER Board Member —
CALVIN BARNES Board President —
JIM CARSWELL Board Member —
LAUREN HOLMEN Board Member —
ROBERT FAIRCLOTH Board President —
TOM GLASER Board Member —
DOLETTE MCDONALD Board Member —
TANYA MILTON Board Member —
COLIN SCHOFIELD Board President —
RUTH KEITH Secretary —
STEPHEN LYMAN Board Member —
JEFF TUCKER Treasurer —
MELODY RODRIGUEZ Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAULA FOGARTY Executive Dir. 16.1% of Rev
DAVID ALTSCHILLER Board Member —
CALVIN BARNES Board President —
FARRELL CLICK Board Member —
MARC DUNSTON Board Member —
ROBERT FAIRCLOTH Board Member —
TOM GLASER Board Member —
DOLETTE MCDONALD Board Member —
FRANK MENDELSON Board Member —
TANYA MILTON Board Member —
HOWARD PAUL Board President —
COLIN SCHOFIELD Board President —
RUTH KEITH Secretary —
STEPHEN LYMAN Board Member —
JEFF TUCKER Treasurer —
MELODY RODRIGUEZ Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAULA FOGARTY EXECUTIVE DI 8.6% of Rev
DAVID ALTSCHILLER Board Member —
CALVIN BARNES Board Member —
FARRELL CLICK Board Member —
MARC DUNSTON Board Member —
ROBERT FAIRCLOTH Board Member —
TOM GLASER Board Member —
KIM GUSBY Board Member —
DOLETTE MCDONALD Board Member —
FRANK MENDELSON 2ND VICE PRE —
TANYA MILTON 1ST VICE PRE —
HOWARD PAUL BOARD PRESID —
JUAN RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
COLIN SCHOFIELD Board Member —
RUTH KEITH BOARD SECRET —
STEPHEN LYMAN Board Member —
LUELLA SANDERS Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 209 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 50 points below the peer median (5 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 24 over 5 years (declining by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.