Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
58
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 23.0% 58 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 23.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 39.9% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 13.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melissa Ailiff Executive Director 33.9% of Rev
Tola Sun Mueller Treasurer
Brett Hargis Secretary
David Adler Board Member
Aaron Bernard Board Member
Gerald Fitzgerald Board Member
James Gorsuch Board Member
Angela Prodrick Board Member
Michele Sparks Board Member
Brittany Sumner Board Member
Gary Tester Board Member
Simone Wood Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melissa Ailiff Executive Director 23.0% of Rev
Gerald Fitzgerald Board President
Angela Prodrick Board President
James Gorsuch Board President
Brett Hargis Secretary
Tola Sun Board Member
David Adler Board Member
Aaron Bernard Board Member
Michele Sparks Board Member
Brittany Sumner Board Member
Simone Wood Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAUREN RUTLEDGE ED JAN-SEPT 21.6% of Rev
ERIC KERCHNER ED OCT-DEC 7.2% of Rev
JOSH DUNKIN Board President
JAMIE GORSUCH VICE PRESIDE
JEAN TUECH Treasurer
DAVID ADLER Board Member
CRYSTAL CAULEY Board Member
CHELSEA ADKINS Secretary
MARGO LEA Board Member
JEFF FISSELL Board Member
BRETT HARGIS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HANNAH DUNCAN ED JAN-JUN 18.0% of Rev
LAUREN RUTLEDGE ED JUL-DEC 11.0% of Rev
JOSH DUNKIN Board President
JAMIE GORSUCH VICE PRESIDE
JEAN TUECH Treasurer
DAVID ADLER Board Member
CRYSTAL CAULEY Board Member
DOUG GELBERT Board Member
ELISA JARRIN Board Member
MARGO LEA Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HANNAH DUNCAN EXECUTIVE DI 25.6% of Rev
JOSH DUNKIN Board President
CHARLES KEEFER VICE PRESIDE
CHELSEA ATKINS Secretary
JEAN TUECH Treasurer
DAVID ADLER Board Member
CRYSTAL CAULEY Board Member
DOUG GELBERT Board Member
JAMIE GORSUCH Board Member
ELISA JARRIN Board Member
MARGO LEA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
58 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points above the peer median (90 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 23.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.