Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.4% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 25.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 11.2% 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 33.4% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 10.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 13.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 19.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 23.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 19.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 5.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 53 Fragile Recovery
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Katie Cornell Executive Director 12.4% of Rev
Pete Perez Board President
Brandy Bourne Board President
Lori Hines Treasurer
Susan Harper Board Member
Lauren Brunk Board Member
Micah Mackenzie Board Member
Luke Lingle Board Member
Liz Whalen Tallent Board Member
John Ager Board Member
Alexa Kincaid Board Member
Martin Moore Board Member
Hannah Randall Board Member
Kaye Phillips Zusmann Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Katie Cornell Executive Director 9.7% of Rev
Pete Perez Board President
Josh Batenhorst Board President
Noel Swartz Treasurer
Gael Perry Pearson Secretary
Susan Harper Board Member
Bill Dorfman Board Member
Brandy Bourne Board Member
Eunice Ward Board Member
Micah Mackenzie Board Member
Luke Lingle Board Member
Gar Ranland Board Member
Liz Whalen Tallent Board Member
David Feingold Board Member
Lori Hines Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Katie Cornell Executive Director 9.0% of Rev
Pete Perez Board President
Josh Batenhorst Board President
Noel Swartz Treasurer
Gael Perry Pearson Secretary
Michael Ebbs Board Member
Bill Dorfman Board Member
Brandy Bourne Board Member
Eunice Ward Board Member
Ehren Cruz Board Member
Luke Lingle Board Member
Gar Ranland Board Member
Liz Whalen Tallent Board Member
David Feingold Board Member
Lori Hines Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Katie Cornell Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
Pete Perez Board President
Josh Batenhorst Board President
Noel Swartz Treasurer
Gael Perry Pearson Secretary
Michael Ebbs Board Member
Bill Dorfman Board Member
Heather Stefani Board Member
Eunice Ward Board Member
Ehren Cruz Board Member
Luke Lingle Board Member
Gar Ranland Board Member
Liz Tallent Whalen Board Member
David Feingold Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 37 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points above the peer median (60 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.