Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 11.6% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 10.5% 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 18.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 11.4% 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 20.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 19.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 24.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — — 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — — 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER LAINE Executive Director 11.6% of Rev
PAMELA BROWN Board President —
JENNIFER COLBY Board Member —
JEANINE RIDDLE Board Member —
ROSANNA ALVAREZ Board Member —
ARTURO ROSETTE Board Member —
DEVII RAO Board President —
ENRIQUE LUNA Treasurer —
JONELL CASADA Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER LAINE Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
PAMELA BROWN Board Member —
JEANINE RIDDLE Board Member —
LOUISE ROY Board Member —
ARTURO ROSETTE Board Member —
DEVII RAO Treasurer —
RACHEL WOHLANDER Board President —
JONELL CASADA Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER LAINE Executive Director 6.4% of Rev
REBECCA PEARSON Board Member —
DYLAN SANDSTROM Board Member —
JULIO ORTIZ Board Member —
MICHAELA GRAVES Board Member —
JONELL CASADA Board Member —
MIKE SELF Board Member —
LOUISE ROY Board Member —
NATALIA PRESSMAN Board Member —
SAL DURAN Treasurer —
SHAWN NOVACK Board President —
PAMELA BROWN Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER LAINE Executive Director 5.8% of Rev
SAL DURAN Board Member —
SHAWN NOVACK Board Member —
PAMELA BROWN Board President —
REBECCA PEARSON Secretary —
DYLAN SANDSTROM Board President —
JULIO ORTIZ Board Member —
MICHAELA GRAVES Board Member —
MIKE SELF Board Member —
LOUISE ROY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,023 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points below the peer median (25 vs. 72).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.