Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
60
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 60 Stable Stable Watch
2022 47 Fragile Recovery
2021 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 60 Stable Stable Watch
2018 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 57 Fragile Recovery
2016 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 49 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE GURRY Board Member
JOHN HORLBECK Board Member
BOB KRANTZ Board Member
RON ROTZKO Board Member
CHRISTIN NAVITSKY Board Member
MORGAN SMITH Board Member
JULIAN PARKER Board President
DAVID PARLER Board President
RANDY ESPESETH Secretary
STEPHAN CHRISTIANSEN Treasurer
STEWART MIXON Board President

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEWART MIXON Board Member
JACK EVANS Board Member
STEVE GURRY Board Member
DAVID PARLOR Board Member
JOHN HORLBECK Board Member
ROBERT KRANTZ Board Member
RONALD ROTZKO Board Member
DREW YORK Board President
JULIAN PARKER Board President
RANDALL ESPESETH Secretary
RALPH L MELLARD Treasurer
JAMES WHITT Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEWART MIXON Board Member
JACK EVANS Board Member
STEVE GURRY Board Member
LAWTON GIMBALL Board Member
SHANE SHAARDA Board Member
JOHN HORLBECK Board Member
ROBERT KRANTZ Board Member
RONALD ROTZKO Board Member
ANDREW EVANS Board President
DREW YORK Board President
RANDALL ESPESETH Secretary
RALPH L MELLARD Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEWART MIXON Board Member
JACK EVANS Board Member
STEVE GURRY Board Member
LAWTON GIMBALL Board Member
SHANE SHAARDA Board Member
JOHN HORLBECK Board Member
ROBERT KRANTZ Board Member
RONALD ROTZKO Board Member
ANDREW EVANS Board President
DREW YORK Board President
RANDALL ESPESETH Secretary
RALPH L MELLARD Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH BROCKINGTON Board President
DREW EVANS Board President
RANDY ESPESETH Secretary
JOSH STOKES Treasurer
STEPHEN GURRY LIBRARIAN
LAWTON GIMBALL HISTORIAN
SHANE SHAARDA Board Member
PETER HENDRIKS Board Member
BOB KRANTZ Board Member
RON ROTZKO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
60 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 98 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 57 points above the peer median (90 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.