Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
24
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 24.3% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 19.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 16.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 23.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 18.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 19.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 17.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 12.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Allison Pederson Executive Director 24.3% of Rev
Jonathan Lee Board President
Sarah Vaughn Secretary
Carol Ann Beasley Treasurer
Eric Tew Board Member
Hannah Howle Board Member
Teresa Oelze Board Member
Mark Ingram Board Member
Megan Woosley-Goodman Board Member
Jasna Shannon Board Member
Susan Askins Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRANDI WHEELER Board Member
MARIA CAMPBELL JONES Board Member
ALISSA SPITTLE Board President
MISSY CUMMINGS Board Member
DEBORAH COX Board Member
JONATHAN LEE Board President
JENNIFER MARSHALL Board President
TH PIERCE Treasurer
ERIC TEW Board Member
RHONDA COKER Board Member
CAROL ANN BEASLEY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHERYL HOFFMAN Board President
PAM YOUNGBLOOD Board Member
ALISSA SPITTLE Board President
MONTY BELL Board Member
MISSY CUMMINGS Board Member
DEBORAH COX Board Member
JONATHAN LEE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 98 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (5 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.