Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
36
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 9.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 — — 11.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 11.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 15.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 8.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 14.2% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 14.5% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 14.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 14.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 11.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 14.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 10.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 7.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Catherine Keen Hock Board President —
Jennifer Jones Board Member —
Rayna Stoycheva Treasurer —
Stephanie Koch Secretary —
Julia Testa Board Member —
Derek Goldin Board Member —
Jasmine Pitt Board President —
LaTonya McCummings Board Member —
Aaliyah Johnson Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Gentry Executive Director 9.3% of Rev
JENNIFER GENTRY Executive Director 9.2% of Rev
Jennifer Jones Board President —
Rayna Stoycheva Board President —
Stephanie Koch Secretary —
Douglas Cason Board Member —
Brian Coghill Board Member —
Heather Coghill Board Member —
LaTonya McCummings Board Member —
Jennifer Scheib Board Member —
Joanne Slane Board Member —
JENNIFER JONES Board President —
RAYNA STOYCHEVA Board President —
STEPHANIE KOCH Secretary —
BRIAN COGHILL Board Member —
HEATHER COGHILL Board Member —
JASMIN HAINEY Board Member —
JENNIFER REAVIS Board Member —
WILL NAPPER Board Member —
JENNIFER SCHEIB Board Member —
JO SLANE Board Member —
DOUGLAS CASON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER GENTRY Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Jennifer Gentry Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
PATSY LAIRD Board Member —
BRIAN COGHILL Board Member —
HEATHER COGHILL Board Member —
Jennifer Jones Board President —
JENNIFER JONES Board President —
Rayna Stoycheva Board President —
RAYNA STOYCHEVA Board President —
Stephanie Koch Secretary —
JASMIN HAINEY Board Member —
Brian Coghill Board Member —
STEPHANIE KOCH Secretary —
Heather Coghill Board Member —
WILL NAPPER Board Member —
Jasmin Hainey Board Member —
Jennifer Hainey Board Member —
Will Napper Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 221 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (15 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.