Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 37.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 31.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 26.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 47.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 46.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 23.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 17.4% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 19.4% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 23.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 27.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 23.6% 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 24.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 24.7% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 25.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINE KASTNER Executive Director 21.1% of Rev
ALFRED STURGIS Board Member 16.6% of Rev
ANIL GEHI Board Member
AMBER JONES Board Member
DAN GAUGERT Board Member
MARY ROBERT MCGRATH Board Member
VALERIE GRASSO Board Member
CHRIS ANDERSON Board President
KEITH KAPP Board Member
KATHERINE PELLACK Board President
EVELYN MCCAULEY Board Member
WINSOME O'NEILL Secretary
DIOGENES RUIZ Board Member
CHARN REID Board Member
PAM HEYE Treasurer
ANN ROBERTSON Board Member
CHARLES PEACOCK Board Member
KYLE STILL Board Member
SALLY THOMAS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINE KASTNER Executive Director 19.1% of Rev
ALFRED STURGIS Board Member 7.5% of Rev
LESLIE HEAVEY Board Member
TESIA HARRISON Board Member
WILLIAM LEE Board Member
MICHAEL TREXLER Board Member
CHRIS ANDERSON Board Member
KEITH KAPP Board Member
FRANCIS CIANFROCCA Board Member
CHARN REID Board Member
RAHSAAN MCNEILL Board Member
ROB TILLER Board Member
ANN ROBERTSON Board Member
LEE WAGNER Treasurer
KAY PELLACK Board President
EVELYN MCCAULEY Secretary
JEFF HENSLEY Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINE KASTNER Executive Director 18.2% of Rev
ALFRED STURGIS Board Member 12.9% of Rev
TESIA HARRISON Board Member
WILLIAM LEE Board Member
MICHAEL TREXLER Board Member
MEGAN GRAY Board Member
KAY PELLACK Board Member
MATT SAWCHAK Board Member
FRANCIS CIANFROCCA Board Member
CHARN REID Board Member
FRANCINE ROBERSON Board Member
ROB TILLER Board Member
LESLIE HEAVEY Board President
LEE WAGNER Treasurer
STEPHANIE DEMING Secretary
JEFF HENSLEY Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points below the peer median (15 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 37.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~32 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.