Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 9.5% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 5.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 1.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 2.7% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 2.9% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 1.7% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 3.9% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 8.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 3.3% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 7.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 5.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 5.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 9.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pamela Myers Executive Director 9.5% of Rev
Paul Lentz Saenger Board President —
Paula Dawkins Board President —
Karen Praytor Treasurer —
Julia Peterson Secretary —
Herbert Butch Patrick Board President —
Robert Benites Board Member —
Tami Bebber Board Member —
Chris Cavanaugh Board Member —
Rose Chambers Board Member —
Carolyn Coward Board Member —
Betsy Cunagin Board Member —
Rufus Dollar Board Member —
Tyler Emerson-Dorsch Board Member —
Joey Gigliotti Board Member —
Lei Han Board Member —
George Stowe Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pamela Myers Executive Director 9.1% of Rev
Herbert Butch Patrick Chairman —
Kevin Click Interim Vice Chairman —
Karen Praytor Treasurer —
Lin Andrews Immediate Past Chairman —
Alex Bernstein Board Member —
Courtney Blossman Board Member —
Carolyn Coward Board Member —
Tami Bebber Board Member —
Paula Dawkins Board Member —
Russell Newton Board Member —
Julia Peterson Board Member —
Michelle Weitzman Docent Representative —
Paul Lentz Saenger Board Member —
Gary Zahler Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pamela Myers Executive Director 9.3% of Rev
Herbert Butch Patrick Chairman —
Marianne Weaver Vice Chairman —
Karen Praytor Treasurer —
Darren Green Secretary —
Robert Sipes Board President —
Kevin Click Secretary —
Lin Andrews Immediate Past Chairman —
Alex Bernstein Board Member —
Courtney Blossman Board Member —
Carolyn Coward Board Member —
Tami Bebber Board Member —
Paula Dawkins Board Member —
Katherine James Board Member —
Russell Newton Board Member —
Julia Peterson Board Member —
Sarah Reincke Docent Representative —
Rob Pulleyn Board Member —
Paul Lentz Saenger Board Member —
Terri Sigler Board Member —
Omari Simmons Board Member —
Gary Zahler Board Member —
David Huff Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pamela Myers Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Herbert Butch Patrick Chairman —
Marianne Weaver Vice Chairman —
Karen Praytor Treasurer —
Darren Green Secretary —
Robert Sipes Board President —
Kevin Click Secretary —
Lin Andrews Immediate Past Chairman —
Alex Bernstein Board Member —
Courtney Blossman Board Member —
Carolyn Coward Board Member —
Nancy Ferguson Board Member —
Nancy Holmes Board Member —
Katherine James Board Member —
Russell Newton Board Member —
Julia Peterson Board Member —
Sarah Reinke Docent Representative —
Rob Pulleyn Board Member —
Paul Lentz Saenger Board Member —
Terri Sigler Board Member —
Judy Swan Board Member —
Gary Zahler Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 96 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (40 vs. 77).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.