Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
39
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 33.8% 39 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 14.5% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 24.7% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 16.5% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 1.4% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 11.6% 50 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 16.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 17.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 17.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 24.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 13.9% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 19.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 3.4% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PETER LEONARD Board Member 20.6% of Rev
MARCO NISTICO Board Member 0.1% of Rev
LIZ FOSTER Board President
MARJORIE KEYMER Board President
BETTYE THOMAS CHAMBERS Secretary
DOUG LEE Treasurer
STEVE BALDWIN Board Member
LAMAR CECIL Board Member
ALLISON DAUGHERTY Board Member
DELORES FOWLER Board Member
MARY CATHERINE GARRISON Board Member
MARGARET ANNE HILL Board Member
SHIRLEY SAUNDERS JONES Board Member
WENDY KENNEDY Board Member
SUSAN MORRIS Board Member
DAVID NEUMEYER Board Member
JANICE C PUCKETT Board Member
PATRICIA SCHEWEL Board Member
DAVID TATE Board Member
ROBERT C WOOD III Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PETER LEONARD Board Member 15.4% of Rev
MARCO NISTICO Board Member 6.1% of Rev
LIZ FOSTER Board President
MARJORIE KEYMER Board President
BETTYE THOMAS CHAMBERS Secretary
DOUG LEE Treasurer
TOM RICHARDS Board Member
STEVE BALDWIN Board President
BRUCE CHRISTIAN Board President
LAMAR CECIL Board Member
ALLISON DAUGHERTY Board Member
LAUREN DIANICH Board President
MARY CATHERINE GARRISON Board Member
MARGARET ANNE HILL Board Member
WENDY KENNEDY Board President
DAVID LEE Board Member
POWELL M LEITCH III Board Member
DAVID NEUMEYER Board President
JANICE C PUCKETT Board Member
PATRICIA SCHEWEL Board President
DAVID TATE Board Member
ROBERT C WOOD III Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LIZ FOSTER Board President
MARJORIE KEYMER Board President
BETTYE THOMAS CHAMBERS Secretary
DOUG LEE Treasurer
STEVE BALDWIN Board Member
LAMAR CECIL Board Member
ALLISON DAUGHTERY Board Member
LAUREN DIANICH Board Member
MARY GARRISON Board Member
WENDY KENNEDY Board Member
DAVID NEUMEYER Board Member
JANICE C PUCKETT Board Member
TOM RICHARDS Board Member
PATRICIA SCHEWEL Board Member
DAVE TATE Board Member
ROBIN WOOD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (45 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 39 over 5 years (declining by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~24 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.