Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 46 Fragile Recovery
2021 38 Fragile Recovery
2020 51 Fragile Recovery
2019 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Chinh Le Board President
Quang Luc Board Member
Lynn Ngo Board Member
Chan Le Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Chinh Le Board President
Quang Luc Board Member
Lynn Ngo Board Member
Chan Le Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Chinh Le Board President
Quang Luc Board Member
Lynn Ngo Board Member
Chan Le Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in CA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.