Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 61 Stable Stable Watch
2021 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 43 Fragile Recovery
2014 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Maureen Clay Board Member
Michelle Sakamoto Board Member
Linda Barut Board Member
Stephanie Agena Board Member
Sandrine Espino Board Member
Christine Hanakawa Board Member
Janelle Perreira Board Member
Lani Arakaki Board President
Kahala Ninomiya Secretary
Alison Yu Treasurer
Christaleen Sagucio Board President
Laraine Kamei Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Angelica Kaina Board President
Susan Kanetake Secretary
Staci Ho Secretary
Ryan Mina Board President
Joy Ishiara Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in HI for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.