Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
33
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 16.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 — — 24.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 30.4% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 22.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 16.2% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 27.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHY HUPP Board Member —
ARISA KUSUMI SULLIVAN Board Member —
JEN STONE Board Member —
JOSHUA COLLINS Board Member —
CHELSEA MAIER Board Member —
KIP KELLY Board Member —
LAURA JUEL Board Member —
KERA YOUNKER Board Member —
MITZI CHOATE Board Member —
JULIA WORKMAN Board President —
FLORENCE SMITH Treasurer —
JEFF BERST Board President —
JOHN CLAUDE BEMIS Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN CLAUDE BEMIS Board Member —
SUHER ADI Board Member —
JEANETTA HOPKINS Board Member —
JEFF BERST Board Member —
KATE BRILAKIS Board Member —
CHELSEA MAIER Board Member —
SARAH HALIHAN SMITH Secretary —
CATHLEEN TURNER Board Member —
JOSHUA COLLINS Board President —
DON NORMAN Treasurer —
DAVID HAYES Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Torey S Mishoe Executive Director 19.5% of Rev
Torey S Mishoe Board Member 10.3% of Rev
Mollie Thomas Board Member 1.5% of Rev
Chris Meazell Board President —
Michael Winger Board President —
Joshua Collins Board President —
Anna Linvill Treasurer —
David Hays Secretary —
John Claude Bemis Board Member —
William Davis Board Member —
Ali Givens Board Member —
Jeanetta Hopkins Board Member —
Cathleen Turner Board Member —
David Hays Board President —
Doris Friend Board President —
Joshua Collins Board President —
Anna Linvill Secretary —
Merle Williams Treasurer —
John Claude Bemis Board Member —
William Davis Board Member —
Diane Edwards Board Member —
Ali Givens Board Member —
Jeanetta Hopkins Board Member —
Chris Meazell Board Member —
Luba Sawczyn Board Member —
Cathleen Turner Board Member —
Bill Whitmore Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 23 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points below the peer median (15 vs. 66).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.