Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 6.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 8.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 7.3% 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 8.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 8.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 6.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 5.8% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 6.9% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 5.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 6.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 6.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 10.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY JORDAN KINCAID END 21523 EXECUTIVE DI 6.0% of Rev
AMY JORDAN KINCAID EXECUTIVE DI 5.5% of Rev
LYNN GWYN Board Member
SAM METZLER Board Member
ADAM SEBASTIAN Board Member
OWENS DANIELS Board Member
BUD MARTIN Board Member
KATIE WILLIAMS Board Member
DOROTHY HURT Board Member
ALEXANDER GERSHNER Board Member
BRIDGET HAYES Board Member
MARK JONES Board Member
LAURANITA KATENDE Board Member
KATIE LEFELER Board Member
NIKKI MOORE Board Member
TRENT WALL Board Member
DAVID VALLIERE Board President
KAREN MORRIS Secretary
LYN WILLIAMS Treasurer
RICHARD KELLY IMMEDIATE PA
LAUREN DAVIS BEG 21523 EXECUTIVE DI
KAREN MORRIS Board Member
BERNADETTE WALLACE Board Member
KELLEY GONDRING Board Member
LYNN GWYN Board Member
SAM METZLER Board Member
JOAN SCHANCK Board Member
ADAM SEBASTIAN Board Member
DUNCAN LEWIS Board Member
OWENS DANIELS Board Member
BUD MARTIN Board Member
KATIE WILLIAMS Board Member
RICHARD KELLY Board President
DANIEL YOHANNES Secretary
DAVE VALLIERE Treasurer
DOROTHY HURT IMMEDIATE PA

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY JORDAN KINCAID EXECUTIVE DI 4.8% of Rev
ELIZABETH REPETTI Board Member
BERNADETTE WALLACE Board Member
ADAM SEBASTAIN Board Member
JOAN SCHANCK Board Member
SAM METZLER Board Member
OWENS DANIELS Board Member
LYNN GWYN Board Member
KELLEY GONDRING Board Member
KAREN MORRIS Board Member
STERLING KELLY Board President
DOROTHY HURT IMMEDIATE PA
DAVE VALLIERE Treasurer
DANIEL YOHANNES Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 5 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 34 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.