Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2021 — — 12.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 2.7% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 2.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 — — 2.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 1.9% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — 1.3% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 0.9% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 1.5% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 3.1% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — 2.0% 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 — — 2.0% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINA CLARK BLOODGOOD Board President —
AYA TAKEUCHI Treasurer —
BARAK BEN-GAL Board Member —
ALISON JACKSON Board Member —
CHUCK KAPELKE Board Member —
BOBBY BRENNAN Board Member —
KRYSTA LAPCEVIC Board Member —
SHOSHANA CHAZAN Board Member —
MEREDITH LAPONTE Board Member —
MICHAEL DAILEY Board Member —
SHARI HOLLIS-ROSS Board Member —
ERICA WEBER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nina Meehan Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
Paul Sugarman Board President —
Christina Clark Bloodgood Board President —
Steven Giacomi Treasurer —
Erica Weber Secretary —
Victoria Larson Board Member —
Holly Below Board Member —
Shoshana Chazan Board Member —
Aldona Clottey Board Member —
Megan Gardner Board Member —
Chuck Kapelke Board Member —
Krysta Lapcevic Board Member —
Meredith Lapointe Board Member —
Andrew Leavitt Board Member —
Marcia Linn Board Member —
Margaret Micki Miller Board Member —
Andrea Walker Board Member —
Bobby Brenman Board Member —
Barak Ben-Gal Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nina Meehan Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
Paul Sugarman Board President —
Christina Clark Bloodgood Board President —
Steven Giacomi Treasurer —
Victoria Wells Larson Secretary —
Vivian Auslander Board Member —
Holly Below Board Member —
Shoshana Chazan Board Member —
Aldona Clottey Board Member —
Megan Gardner Board Member —
Chuck Kapelke Board Member —
Krysta Lapcevic Board Member —
Meredith Lapointe Board Member —
Andrew Leavitt Board Member —
Marcia Linn Board Member —
Margaret Micki Miller Board Member —
Andrea Walker Board Member —
Janet Walker Board Member —
Bobby Brenman Board Member —
Barak Ben-Gal Board Member —
Erica Weber Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.