Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
59
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2017 59 Fragile Recovery
2016 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Diane Moser Education Coordinator
Lee Owens Board President
Lois Walko Secretary
Carrol Morgan Artistic Director
Patrice Werner Treasurer
Charlotte Burrill Docent Coordinator
Celeste Johnson Artistic Director
Esther Evans Board Member
George Meadows Grants And Fundraising
Lee Cochrane Hospitality Coordinator

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marilynn Deane Mendell Board President
Lee Owens Board President
Lois Walko Secretary
Carrol Morgan Artistic Director
Patrice Werner Treasurer
Charlotte Burrill Docent Coordinator
Celeste Johnson Artistic Director
Carol Rauh Membership Coordinator
George Meadows Grants And Fundraising
Lee Cochrane Hospitality Coordinator
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
59 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 147 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 64 points above the peer median (100 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.