Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
29
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 60.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 28.8% 48 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 27.1% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2018 28.3% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2010 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dustin J Willetts Artistic Director 51.1% of Rev
Debra L DeMiero Collaborative Pianist 9.6% of Rev
Michael Shouse CoPresident
Collene Lynch CoPresident
LeeAnn Saxon Board President
Christine L Johnson Board President
Terence Iadanza Treasurer
Peggy McCormick Secretary
Hallie W Olson Board Member
Steven Cobb Board Member
Catherine Dovey Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dustin J Willetts Artistic Director 49.4% of Rev
Dustin J Willetts Artistic Director 45.4% of Rev
Dustin J Willetts Artistic Director 45.4% of Rev
Debra L DeMiero Collaborative Pianist 15.4% of Rev
Debra L DeMiero Collaborative Pianist 9.8% of Rev
Debra L DeMiero Collaborative Pianist 5.0% of Rev
Steven Cobb Board President
Hallie W Olson Board President
Michael Shouse Board President
Terence Iadanza Treasurer
Kathryn L Hanski Secretary
Betty Ngan Board Member
Robert Nemeth Board Member
Catherine Dovey Board Member
Barbara Kindness Board Member
Robert Nemeth Board President
Hallie W Olson Board President
Michael Shouse Board President
Betty Ngan Board President
Terence Iadanza Treasurer
Kathryn L Hanski Secretary
Steven Cobb Board Member
Catherine Dovey Board Member
Barbara Kindness Board Member
Robert Nemeth Board President
Hallie W Olson Board President
Michael Shouse Board President
Betty Ngan Board President
Terence Iadanza Treasurer
Kathryn L Hanski Secretary
Steven Cobb Board Member
Catherine Dovey Board Member
Barbara Kindness Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 25 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 12 points below the peer median (15 vs. 27).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 60.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.