Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
53
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 19.4% 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2023 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 57 Fragile Recovery
2020 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tanya Song Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
Jason Chen Board President
Jennifer Hindman Board President
Beth Shamaiengar Board Member
Karen Talley Treasurer
Mei-Li Beane Board Member
Dexter Daniel Board Member
Laura Killinger Board Member
Denise Koch Board Member
Todd Krause Board Member
Monika Miller Secretary
LaDonna Steinlicht Board Member
Rafael A Velez Board Member
Kollister Williams II Board Member
Nathan Mortier Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JASON CHEN Board President
JENNIFER HINDMAN Board President
BETH SHAMAIENGAR Secretary
SARA A STEIN Treasurer
MEI-LI BEANE Board Member
TINA BROOKS Board Member
DEXTER DANIEL Board Member
LAURA KILLINGER Board Member
DENISE KOCH Board Member
TODD KRAUSE Board Member
MONIKA MILLER Board Member
NATHAN MORTIER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 147 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (75 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.