Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 37.0% 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 28.7% 52 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 27.4% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 17.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2018 18.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 22.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 25.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 28.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXIS TRUITT EXECUTIVE DI 35.1% of Rev
ASHLEY FORMAN Board Member
MITCH MATTSON Board President
AIMEE REID Treasurer
JOEL JASON RODRIGUEZ Board President
ELIZABETH DUNN-RUIZ Board Member
PENNY CAYWOOD Secretary
JONATHAN JONES Board Member
SINDY CASTRO Board Member
MELINDA MOORE Board Member
MARCUS SIMMONS Board Member
MICHAEL AVILA Board Member
SARAH CONKELTON-KIDD Board Member
CHAD DIKE Board Member
ALICIA FUSS Board Member
BRODRICK SANTEZ RYANS Board Member
COLETTE SILVESTRI Board Member
NIGEL SEMAJ BARNES Board Member
MORGANNE EVANS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXIS TRUITT EXECUTIVE DI 29.1% of Rev
ASHLEY FORMAN Board Member
MITCH MATTSON Board President
AIMEE REID Treasurer
JOEL JASON RODRIGUEZ INCOMING CHA
JAMIE MACPHERSON Board Member
FRAN SILLAU Board Member
RHONDA WILSON Board Member
ELIZABETH PATTERSON Board Member
PENNY CAYWOOD Secretary
JONATHAN JONES Board Member
SINDY CASTRO Board Member
MELINDA MOORE Board Member
MARCUS SIMMONS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXIS TRUITT EXECUTIVE DI 26.8% of Rev
FELECIA BROWN Board Member
WYCKHAM AVERY Board Member
ASHLEY FORMAN Board Member
LENORA INEZ BROWN Board Member
JENNIFER KATONA IMMEDIATE PA
CARLA GOMEZ KLEIN Board Member
MITCH MATTSON Board President
AIMEE REID Treasurer
JOEL JASON RODRIGUEZ INCOMING CHA
JAMIE MACPHERSON Board Member
FRAN SILLAU Board Member
RHONDA WILSON Board Member
ELENA VELASCO Board Member
GUS WELTSEK Board Member
ELIZABETH PATTERSON Board Member
PENNY CAYWOOD Secretary
JONATHAN JONES Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXIS TRUITT EXECUTIVE DI 26.3% of Rev
STACEY ARDELEAN IMMEDIATE PA
ALEX ATES Board Member
WYCKHAM AVERY Board Member
ASHLEY FORMAN Board Member
MAREN GALARPE Board Member
JENNIFER KATONA Board President
SARAH KENNY Board Member
MITCH MATTSON Board Member
AMIEE REID Treasurer
JOEL JASON RODRIGUEZ Board Member
ANDREW RYDER Board Member
FRAN SILLAU Board Member
KIYOKO SIMMS Secretary
ELENA VELASCO Board Member
GUS WELTSEK Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 56 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 65 points above the peer median (90 vs. 25).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.