Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 55 Fragile Recovery
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAM SMITH Board Member
MATT ABBOTT Board Member
PAUL SMITH Board Member
LARRY CLARK Board Member
TOMOKO GILLESPIE Board Member
SHIRLA HUDSON Board Member
SHIRLEY MCCALEB Board Member
PHYLLIS SMITH Board Member
CAROLYN SHORTT Board Member
PAULA BRYANT Board Member
FRANK LEE Board Member
KRIS SKELDON-GOMER Board Member
CHARLOTTE TETTERTON Board Member
DOUGLAS FORD Board President
GERALD ROXBURY Board President
JANE DANIEL Treasurer
LINDA MERCER Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOUG FORD Board President
GERALD ROXBURY Board President
LINDA MERCER Secretary
JANE J DANIEL Treasurer
PHYLLIS SMITH Board Member
ANN GORDON HUNT Board Member
CHARLOTTE TETTERTON Board Member
BILL MCCALEB Board Member
DONNA BOUTWELL Board Member
LARRY CLARK Board Member
PAUL SMITH Board Member
SHIRLEY MCCALEB Board Member
KATHERINE SHORTT Board Member
CAROLYN SHORTT Board Member
BARBARA COLEMAN-BROWN Board Member
SHIRLA HUDSON Board Member
PAULA BRYANT Board Member
TOMOKO GILLESPIE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOUG FORD Board President
GERALD ROXBURY Board President
LINDA MERCER Secretary
JANE J DANIEL Treasurer
PHYLLIS SMITH Board Member
ANN GORDON HUNT Board Member
CHARLOTTE TETTERTON Board Member
BILL MCCALEB Board Member
DONNA BOUTWELL Board Member
LARRY CLARK Board Member
PAUL SMITH Board Member
SHIRLEY MCCALEB Board Member
KATHERINE SHORTT Board Member
CAROLYN SHORTT Board Member
BARBARA COLEMAN-BROWN Board Member
SHIRLA HUDSON Board Member
PAULA BRYANT Board Member
TOMOKO GILLESPIE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TC LEGGETT Board Member
TOMOKO GILLESPIE Board Member
PAUL SMITH Board President
GERALD ROXBURY Board President
PAM SMITH Secretary
JANE JONES Treasurer
PHYLLIS SMITH Board Member
ANN GORDON HUNT Board Member
CHARLOTTE TETTERTON Board Member
BILL MCCALEB Board Member
DONNA BOUTWELL Board Member
LARRY CLARK Board Member
LINDA MERCER Board Member
LINDA DANIEL Board Member
RICHARD STONEMAN Board Member
SHIRLEY MCCALEB Board Member
KATHERINE SHORTT Board Member
HOLT EVANS Board Member
CAROLYN SHORTT Board Member
BARBARA COLEMAN-BROWN Board Member
DOUGLAS FORD Board Member
SHIRLA HUDSON Board Member
PAULA BRYANT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 4 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points above the peer median (60 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.