Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 64 Stable Stable Watch
2022 64 Stable Stable Watch
2021 61 Stable Decline Risk
2020 68 Stable Stable Watch
2019 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 65 Stable Stable Watch
2016 65 Stable Stable Watch
2015 65 Stable Stable Watch
2014 65 Stable Stable Watch
2013 65 Stable Stable Watch
2012 65 Stable Stable Watch
2011 65 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EDWINA HUNTER Board President
CAROL WOLFE-RALPH Treasurer
JUNKO TAKAHASHI Board President

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUNKO TAKAHASHI Board President
CAROL WOLFE-RALPH Treasurer
YOON HUH Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUNKO TAKAHASHI Board President
CAROL WOLFE-RALPH Treasurer
YOON HUH Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUNKO TAKAHASHI Board President
CAROL WOLFE-RALPH Treasurer
YOON HUH Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 75 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 69 points above the peer median (100 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.