Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
60
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 60 Stable Stable Watch
2021 58 Fragile Recovery
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 41 Fragile Recovery
2013 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 41 Fragile Recovery
2011 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2010 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIFFANY MASUTANI Board President
CATHERINE TOTH Board President
ROXANE TSUKADA Treasurer
KELSEY SOMA - TUREK Secretary
CHIZUKO ENDO EXECUTIVE DI
KIRSTIN PAUKA Board Member
TERUHIKO KATAGIRI Board Member
KAREN WATANABE-SAKAMOTO Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIFFANY MASUTANI Board President
CATHERINE TOTH Board President
ROXANE TSUKADA Treasurer
KELSEY SOMA - TUREK Secretary
CHIZUKO ENDO EXECUTIVE DI
KIRSTIN PAUKA Board Member
TERUHIKO KATAGIRI Board Member
KAREN WATANABE-SAKAMOTO Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIFFANY MASUTANI Board President
CATHERINE TOTH Board President
ROXANE TSUKADA Treasurer
KELSEY SOMA - TUREK Secretary
CHIZUKO ENDO EXECUTIVE DI
KIRSTIN PAUKA Board Member
TERUHIKO KATAGIRI Board Member
KAREN WATANABE-SAKAMOTO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
60 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 7 other orgs in HI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points above the peer median (90 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 60 over 5 years (improving by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.