Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 7.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 10.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 12.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 7.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 6.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 12.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 9.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 6.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 6.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 5.5% 40 Fragile Recovery
2012 3.7% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 4.1% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Paata Tsikurishvili Artistic Director 5.2% of Rev
Lisa Greenhill Board Member
Tracy Fisher Board President
Vera Zolotarskaya Board Member
Ann Tunstall Board Member
Mytrang Nguyen Board Member
Sundai Riggins Board President
Julianna Mahley Board Member
Ryan E Merkel Board Member
Rick L Hardy Board President
Allison J Foster Board President
Suzanne Grinnan Secretary
Alec Guroff Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jason Najjoum Board Member 4.9% of Rev
Paata Tsikurishvili Artistic Director 4.6% of Rev
Sundai Riggins Board Member
Ricky Ramon Board Member
Tracy Fisher Board President
Tracy Gabriel Board Member
Teresa Ball Board Member
Suzanne Grinnan Board Member
Ryan E Merkel Board Member
Stephanie King Board President
Kelly Carnes Board Member
Julianna Mahley Board Member
Allison J Foster Board President
Tim Carlton Secretary
Alec Guroff Board President
Rick L Hardy Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jason Najjoum Board Member 6.2% of Rev
Paata Tsikurishvili Artistic Director 4.6% of Rev
Ryan E Merkel Board Member
Julianna Mahley Board Member
Blair Ruble Board Member
Tracy Sayegh Gabriel Board Member
Jeffrey Schragg Board Member
Stephanie King Board Member
Diane Dippold MacIntosh Board Member
Allison J Foster Treasurer
Tim Carlton Secretary
Michael Haskett Board President
Rick L Hardy Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Paata Tsikurishvili Artistic Director 4.8% of Rev
Jason Najjoum Board Member 3.3% of Rev
Tim Carlton Secretary
Allison J Foster Treasurer
Rick L Hardy Board President
Stephanie King Board Member
Michael Haskett Board President
Diane Dippold MacIntosh Board Member
Julianna Mahley Board Member
Ryan E Merkel Board Member
Blair Ruble Board Member
Jeffrey Schragg Board Member
Tracy Sayegh Gabriel Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (0 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.