Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | 16.8% | 39 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | 19.2% | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2021 | — | — | 9.5% | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 38 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | 14.2% | 43 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | 24.3% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | 24.2% | 34 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | 25.4% | 36 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | 20.5% | 39 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | 14.0% | 49 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | 18.6% | 39 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | 25.5% | 38 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diane Lambertson | Board Member | — | ||
| Wanda Stewart | Board Member | — | ||
| Tommy Gladding | Board Member | — | ||
| Laura Morrison | Board Member | — | ||
| Keith Hornberger | Board Member | — | ||
| Vonny Pilchard | Board Member | — | ||
| Tera Taylor | Board Member | — | ||
| Mary Mahler | Board Member | — | ||
| Amy Glenn | Board Member | — | ||
| Rachel B Harris | Board Member | — | ||
| Rob Clarke | Board President | — | ||
| Russ Blake | Board President | — | ||
| Will Stevenson | Treasurer | — | ||
| Sandy Hickman | Secretary | — | ||
| Crystal Matthews | Manager | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 75 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 8 points above the peer median (40 vs. 32).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 43 → 39 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 16.8% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.