Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
41
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.6% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 26.9% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 10.6% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 10.8% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 7.7% 46 Fragile Recovery
2016 7.9% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 3.0% 53 Fragile Recovery
2014 4.8% 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Marie Rhea Board Member 7.8% of Rev
Alexis Hartwick Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
Mark A Rhea Artistic Director 5.9% of Rev
Robert Cali Treasurer
Abigail Isaac Fine Board Member
Abby Levine Board President
Megan Doiron Board Member
Roberta Milman Secretary
Vishwas Vishwas Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN MARIE RHEA Artistic Director 7.4% of Rev
MARK A RHEA FOUNDING DIR 6.8% of Rev
ALEXIS HARTWICK Executive Director 6.0% of Rev
ROBERT CALI Board Member
ABIGAIL ISAAC FINE Board Member
CHRISTOPHER HALL Treasurer
GAIL HANSEN Board Member
TODD K JONES Board Member
RICHARD KELLOGG Board Member
ABBY LEVINE Board Member
MEGAN MACHNIK EXECUTIVE CH
ROBERTA MILMAN Board Member
DANA NEARING Board Member
VISHWAS VISHWAS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK A RHEA PRODUCING AR 5.2% of Rev
SUSAN MARIE RHEA Artistic Director 4.9% of Rev
TODD K JONES Board Member
RICHARD KELLOGG Board Member
ABBY LEVINE Board Member
MEGAN MACHNIK Board Member
RYAN VELANDRIA MCCARTHY Board Member
ROBERTA MILMAN Board Member
VISHWAS Board Member
ROBERT CALI Board Member
WHITNEY DONALDSON Board President
RODDY FLYNN Board Member
CHRISTOPHER HALL Board Member
GAIL HANSEN Board Member
TODD K JONES Board Member
RICHARD KELLOGG Board Member
ABBY LEVINE Board Member
MEGAN MACHNIK Board Member
RYAN VELANDRIA MCCARTHY Board Member
ROBERTA MILMAN Board Member
DANA NEARING Board Member
MARK A RHEA PRODUCING AR
SUSAN MARIE RHEA Artistic Director
VISHWAS Board Member
BOB CALI Board Member
WHITNEY DONALDSON Board President
RODDY FLYNN Board Member
CHRISTOPHER HALL Board Member
GAIL HANSEN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 55 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 18 points above the peer median (60 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.