Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 16.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 15.1% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 17.6% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 23.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 17.8% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 16.5% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 17.5% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 19.4% 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 18.3% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 21.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 18.3% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 19.0% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 18.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2010 17.6% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH GOTTESMAN Board Member 8.7% of Rev
FRANCIS BUZZ MAURO Board Member 8.1% of Rev
Laura Einstein Board Member
Adrianne Marsh Board Member
DENISE HANNA Board President
Alexis Ronickher Board Member
Dr Roberto Ifill Board Member
Rae Vann Board Member
ibby jeppson Board Member
ELLEN PERRY Board President
nia graham Board Member
Mary Mitchelson Treasurer
SHERRY DUNCAN Board Member
JULIE LLOYD Board Member
Elizabeth Davenport Board Member
LIZ WHISNANT Secretary
Luna Samman Board Member
tracy gray Board Member
Matt Bassett Board Member
Megan Robbins Board Member
MICHELLE DEYOUNG Board Member
TERRESITA EDWARDS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRANCIS BUZZ MAURO Board Member 8.1% of Rev
DEBORAH GOTTESMAN Board Member 7.3% of Rev
Laura Einstein Board Member
BETSY HAGUE Board Member
DENISE HANNA Secretary
KRISTINA DUNPHY Board Member
MARY GOLDSMITH Board Member
Rae Vann Board Member
GIL GALLAGHER Board Member
ELLEN PERRY Board President
DR ROBERTO IFILL Board President
HARRY KNIGHT Treasurer
SHERRY DUNCAN Board Member
JULIE LLOYD Board Member
AMANA SIMMONS Board Member
LIZ WHISNANT Board Member
Luna Samman Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRANCIS BUZZ MAURO Board Member 7.8% of Rev
DEBORAH GOTTESMAN Board Member 7.5% of Rev
Laura Einstein Board Member
RICHARD BLOCH Board Member
bETSY HAUGE Board Member
DENISE HANNA Board Member
MONIQUE FORTENBERRY Board President
MARY GOLDSMITH Board Member
Roger Vann Board Member
TIMOTHY O'TOOLE Secretary
ELLEN PERRY Board Member
DR ROBERTO IFILL Board President
HARRY KNIGHT Treasurer
LISA BROWN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points below the peer median (0 vs. 19).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.