Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
37
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 18.5% 37 Fragile Recovery
2022 24.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 22.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 21.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 23.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 12.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 14.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 20.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 24.7% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 19.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Philip Barlow Chairman
Eames Armstrong Secretary
Kristen Bardon Board Member
Lisa Gilotty Board Member
Kathryn McDonnell Board Member
Brian Wiilliamson Treasurer
Jeffry Cuddlin Board Member
Sean Elias Executive Director

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joette James Secretary
Karen Cooper Board Member
Brian Wiilliamson Treasurer
Kathryn McDonnell Board Member
Lisa Gilotty Board Member
Eames Armstrong Board Member
Kristen Bardon Board Member
Philip Barlow Chairman
Sean Elias Executive Director

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Karen Cooper Board Member
Lisa Gilotty Board Member
Kathryn McDonnell Board Member
Joette James Secretary
Eames Armstrong Board Member
Kristen Bardon Board Member
Philip Barlow Chairman
Sean Elias Executive Director

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Hoskinson Board Member
Lisa Gilotty Board Member
Kathryn McDonnell Board Member
Joette James Board Member
Tana Bosshard Board Member
Rebecca Montesi Secretary
Kristen Barden Board Member
Philip Barlow Chairman
B Stanley Executive Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 10 points above the peer median (25 vs. 15).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.