Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 — — 5.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 16.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 13.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 10.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 11.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 12.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 12.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 11.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 12.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 11.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 12.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 11.6% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TALYA CONROY Executive Director 7.0% of Rev
WILKIE SMITH LEITH EX OFFICIO —
SANDRA SURABIAN Board Member —
JAMES CARR Board President —
BRETT CALLAHAN Board President —
KAYTERA CAISON Treasurer —
JAN ALTEN Secretary —
KELLI AREKLETT Board Member —
CATHERINE CROFT Board Member —
GINA DABNEY Board Member —
CHUCK LEOPOLD Board Member —
PAM LEA Board Member —
LAURA MILLS Board Member —
SUHAIL MIR Board Member —
RIC SEGOVIA Board Member —
SARAH WEAVER Board Member —
CAROL MERCHANT KIRBY EX OFFICIO —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEVERLY HESS EXECUTIVE DI 5.6% of Rev
JAN ALTEN Secretary —
ROBERT ANDERSON Board Member —
KAYTERA CAISON Board Member —
BRETT CALLAHAN Board President —
CAPTAIN JAMES CARR Board President —
CATHERINE CROFT Board Member —
GINA DABNEY Board Member —
CAROL HARTT Board Member —
EVETTE HYDER-DAVIS Board Member —
CHUCK LEOPOLD Board Member —
LAURA MILLS Board Member —
SUHAIL MIR Board Member —
BRUCE MOORE Board Member —
KEITH SEGERSON Board Member —
HELEN TAYLOR Board Member —
WILLIAM WHITE Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEVERLY HESS EXECUTIVE DI 5.5% of Rev
JAN ALTEN Secretary —
ROBERT ANDERSON Board Member —
KAYTERA CAISON Board Member —
BRETT CALLAHAN Board President —
CAPTAIN JAMES CARR Board President —
CATHERINE CROFT Board Member —
GINA DABNEY Board Member —
CAROL HARTT Board Member —
EVETTE HYDER-DAVIS Board Member —
CHUCK LEOPOLD Board Member —
SUHAIL MIR Board Member —
BRUCE MOORE Board Member —
KEITH SEGERSON Board Member —
HELEN TAYLOR Board Member —
WILLIAM WHITE Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 141 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 71 points below the peer median (0 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.