Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 5.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 16.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 13.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 10.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 11.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 12.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 12.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 11.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 12.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 11.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 12.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 11.6% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TALYA CONROY Executive Director 7.0% of Rev
WILKIE SMITH LEITH EX OFFICIO
SANDRA SURABIAN Board Member
JAMES CARR Board President
BRETT CALLAHAN Board President
KAYTERA CAISON Treasurer
JAN ALTEN Secretary
KELLI AREKLETT Board Member
CATHERINE CROFT Board Member
GINA DABNEY Board Member
CHUCK LEOPOLD Board Member
PAM LEA Board Member
LAURA MILLS Board Member
SUHAIL MIR Board Member
RIC SEGOVIA Board Member
SARAH WEAVER Board Member
CAROL MERCHANT KIRBY EX OFFICIO

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEVERLY HESS EXECUTIVE DI 5.6% of Rev
JAN ALTEN Secretary
ROBERT ANDERSON Board Member
KAYTERA CAISON Board Member
BRETT CALLAHAN Board President
CAPTAIN JAMES CARR Board President
CATHERINE CROFT Board Member
GINA DABNEY Board Member
CAROL HARTT Board Member
EVETTE HYDER-DAVIS Board Member
CHUCK LEOPOLD Board Member
LAURA MILLS Board Member
SUHAIL MIR Board Member
BRUCE MOORE Board Member
KEITH SEGERSON Board Member
HELEN TAYLOR Board Member
WILLIAM WHITE Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEVERLY HESS EXECUTIVE DI 5.5% of Rev
JAN ALTEN Secretary
ROBERT ANDERSON Board Member
KAYTERA CAISON Board Member
BRETT CALLAHAN Board President
CAPTAIN JAMES CARR Board President
CATHERINE CROFT Board Member
GINA DABNEY Board Member
CAROL HARTT Board Member
EVETTE HYDER-DAVIS Board Member
CHUCK LEOPOLD Board Member
SUHAIL MIR Board Member
BRUCE MOORE Board Member
KEITH SEGERSON Board Member
HELEN TAYLOR Board Member
WILLIAM WHITE Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 28 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points below the peer median (0 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.