Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 7.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 — — — 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 10.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 16.1% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ula Kauppi Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Pat Edmiston Board President —
Rachel Love Board President —
Willie Jones Treasurer —
Jacquelyn Mosby Secretary —
Yevgeniy Dovgalyuk Board Member —
Eric Hollandsworth Board Member —
Susan Morris Board Member —
Justin Ng Board Member —
Sam Vance Board Member —
Jay Ware Board Member —
Mari White Smallshaw Board Member —
Gracelyn Hedrick Board Member —
Medley Lovelace Board Member —
Julie McDonald Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LEWIS EXECUTIVE DI 9.8% of Rev
TINA COX Board Member —
YEVGENIY DOVGALYUK Board Member —
PATRICIA EDMISTON Board Member —
TAD HARDIN Board President —
OUIDA HATCHER Board Member —
ERIC HOLLANDSWORTH Board Member —
WILLIAM JONES Treasurer —
RACHEL LOVE VICE PRESIDE —
JACQUELINE MOSBY Secretary —
JULIE SALMON Board Member —
LARRY SEIPP Board Member —
MARI WHITE SMALLSHAW Board Member —
SAM VANCE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LEWIS EXECUTIVE DI 9.5% of Rev
TINA COX Board Member —
YEVGENIY DOVGALYUK Board Member —
PATRICIA EDMISTON Board Member —
TAD HARDIN Board President —
OUIDA HATCHER Board Member —
ERIC HOLLANDSWORTH Board Member —
WILLIAM JONES Treasurer —
RACHEL LOVE VICE PRESIDE —
JACQUELINE MOSBY Secretary —
JULIE SALMON Board Member —
LARRY SEIPP Board Member —
MARI WHITE SMALLSHAW Board Member —
SAM VANCE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA BAIN Secretary —
TINA COX Board Member —
YEVGENIY DOVGALYUK Board Member —
PATRICIA EDMISTON Board Member —
JAWANSA HALL Board Member —
TAD HARDIN Board President —
ERIC HOLLANDSWORTH Board Member —
WILLIAM JONES Treasurer —
MICHAEL LEWIS EXECUTIVE DI —
RACHEL LOVE Board Member —
JACQUELINE MOSBY Board Member —
JULIE SALMON Board Member —
LARRY SEIPP Board Member —
SAM VANCE Board Member —
WALTER VIRGIL Board Member —
MARI WHITE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 242 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.