Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
29
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 7.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 10.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 16.1% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ula Kauppi Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Pat Edmiston Board President
Rachel Love Board President
Willie Jones Treasurer
Jacquelyn Mosby Secretary
Yevgeniy Dovgalyuk Board Member
Eric Hollandsworth Board Member
Susan Morris Board Member
Justin Ng Board Member
Sam Vance Board Member
Jay Ware Board Member
Mari White Smallshaw Board Member
Gracelyn Hedrick Board Member
Medley Lovelace Board Member
Julie McDonald Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LEWIS EXECUTIVE DI 9.8% of Rev
TINA COX Board Member
YEVGENIY DOVGALYUK Board Member
PATRICIA EDMISTON Board Member
TAD HARDIN Board President
OUIDA HATCHER Board Member
ERIC HOLLANDSWORTH Board Member
WILLIAM JONES Treasurer
RACHEL LOVE VICE PRESIDE
JACQUELINE MOSBY Secretary
JULIE SALMON Board Member
LARRY SEIPP Board Member
MARI WHITE SMALLSHAW Board Member
SAM VANCE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LEWIS EXECUTIVE DI 9.5% of Rev
TINA COX Board Member
YEVGENIY DOVGALYUK Board Member
PATRICIA EDMISTON Board Member
TAD HARDIN Board President
OUIDA HATCHER Board Member
ERIC HOLLANDSWORTH Board Member
WILLIAM JONES Treasurer
RACHEL LOVE VICE PRESIDE
JACQUELINE MOSBY Secretary
JULIE SALMON Board Member
LARRY SEIPP Board Member
MARI WHITE SMALLSHAW Board Member
SAM VANCE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA BAIN Secretary
TINA COX Board Member
YEVGENIY DOVGALYUK Board Member
PATRICIA EDMISTON Board Member
JAWANSA HALL Board Member
TAD HARDIN Board President
ERIC HOLLANDSWORTH Board Member
WILLIAM JONES Treasurer
MICHAEL LEWIS EXECUTIVE DI
RACHEL LOVE Board Member
JACQUELINE MOSBY Board Member
JULIE SALMON Board Member
LARRY SEIPP Board Member
SAM VANCE Board Member
WALTER VIRGIL Board Member
MARI WHITE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (0 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.