Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
21
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 51.9% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 — — — 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 69.8% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 — — 33.5% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 56.0% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 52.0% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 42.9% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 54.4% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — 46.7% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 16.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 30.8% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 23.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 23.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH HAMILTON Board Member —
SUSAN GOETZE Board Member —
ROBERT SIMMONS Board Member —
JEANINE CHRISTIAN Board President —
ROBERT BRIGGS Board President —
JASON HERRING Secretary —
VIVEKA RYN Treasurer —
LISA WASHINGTON Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN BIALEK Artistic Director 24.9% of Rev
ANDREA BURGOUYNE Executive Director 11.3% of Rev
DAVID BIELENBERG Board Member 9.5% of Rev
RAMONA GALEY Treasurer 5.8% of Rev
SUSAN GOETZE Board Member —
JENN SHAPIRO Board President —
JEANINE CHRISTIAN Board President —
ROBERT BRIGGS Treasurer —
JASON HERRING Secretary —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN BIALEK Artistic Director 24.1% of Rev
ANDREA BURGOYNE Executive Director 16.4% of Rev
RAMONA GALEY Treasurer 9.9% of Rev
SUSAN GOETZE Board Member —
JENN SHAPIRO Board President —
JEANINE CHRISTIAN Board President —
ROBERT BRIGGS Treasurer —
JASON HERRING Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN BIALEK Artistic Director 23.5% of Rev
ANDREA BURGOYNE Executive Director 16.0% of Rev
MERYEM AHMADIAN PROGRAM MANAGER 11.3% of Rev
RAMONA GALEY Treasurer 9.9% of Rev
SUSAN GOETZE Board Member —
JEANINE CHRISTIAN Board President —
ROBERT BRIGGS Board President —
JASON HERRING Secretary —
JENN SHAPIRO Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 163 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 58 points below the peer median (0 vs. 58).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 51.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.