Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.5% 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 18.7% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 10.9% 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 12.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 11.0% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 15.2% 35 Fragile Recovery
2017 16.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 20.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 20.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 13.3% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 8.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 7.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 4.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN C BARKER Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
FRANK CLOWES Board President
DAVID FLEMING Board President
PATRICIA ZAHARKO Treasurer
DEBBIE W GREEN Secretary
TINA BETZ Board Member
GEORGE CHRISTENSEN Board Member
JAMES M ELLISON Board Member
TYLER HOLLOWAY Board Member
NANCY HOUGH Board Member
ANNE KELLIGREW ST CLAIR Board Member
WILLIAM E KIRK III Board Member
DAVID MCBRIDE Board Member
GEORGE MELDRUM Board Member
JESUS H DE LAS SALAS Board Member
LAUREN EM RUSSELL Board Member
WILLIAM WOJCIECHOWSKI Board Member
ELIZABETH COCHRAN Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN C BARKER Executive Director 7.5% of Rev
FRANK CLOWES Board President
CHARLES W BABCOCK Board President
PATRICIA ZAHARKO Treasurer
DEBBIE W GREEN Secretary
TINA BETZ Board Member
STUART BRAHS Board Member
GEORGE CHRISTENSEN Board Member
JAMES M ELLISON Board Member
DAVID FLEMING Board Member
TYLER HOLLOWAY Board Member
NANCY HOUGH Board Member
ANNE KELLIGREW ST CLAIR Board Member
SHELLY A KINSELLA Board Member
WILLIAM E KIRK III Board Member
DAVID MCBRIDE Board Member
GEORGE MELDRUM Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID AMADO Board Member 6.1% of Rev
JOHN C BARKER Executive Director 3.4% of Rev
DAVID J KUBACKI Board President
CHARLES W BABCOCK Board President
ALICE ROCHELLE HUGHES Board President
PATRICIA ZAHARKO Treasurer
DEBBIE LW GREEN Secretary
MATTHEW D DIGUGLIELMO Board Member
JAMES M ELLISON Board Member
JIMI HONOCHICK Board Member
SHELLY A KINSELLA Board Member
MICHAEL MAXWELL Board Member
DAVID MCBRIDE Board Member
ROBERT STODDARD Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID AMADO Board Member 5.9% of Rev
ALAN JORDAN Executive Director 3.3% of Rev
JOHN C BARKER Executive Director 0.6% of Rev
DAVID J KUBACKI Board President
CHARLES W BABCOCK Board President
ALICE ROCHELLE HUGHES Board President
PATRICIA ZAHARKO Treasurer
DEBBIE LW GREEN Secretary
MATTHEW D DIGUGLIELMO Board Member
LANNY EDELSOHN Board Member
JAMES M ELLISON Board Member
JIMI HONOCHICK Board Member
SHELLY A KINSELLA Board Member
GREGORY LAVELLE Board Member
MICHAEL MAXWELL Board Member
DAVID MCBRIDE Board Member
ROBERT STODDARD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 23 other orgs in DE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points above the peer median (60 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.