Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 58 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 58 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 14.2% | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | 25.0% | 48 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 53 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2010 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLLY SIERER | Board President | — | ||
| SUSAN BARTLEY | Treasurer | — | ||
| RUTHIE TOOLE | Secretary | — | ||
| BONNIE MCDONALD | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHAEL SMITH | Board Member | — | ||
| SHAO-TANG SUN | Board Member | — | ||
| SIMEONE TARTAGLIONE | Board Member | — | ||
| SALLY CORNELL | Board Member | — | ||
| ROXANNE RUST | BUSINESS MANAGER | — | ||
| LINDA HECKERT | Board Member | — | ||
| STEVE GETTY | Board President | — | ||
| THOMAS ROCEK | Board Member | — | ||
| POLLY SIERER | Board President | — | ||
| SUSAN BARTLEY | Treasurer | — | ||
| RUTHIE TOOLE | Secretary | — | ||
| BONNIE MCDONALD | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHAEL SMITH | Board Member | — | ||
| SHAO-TANG SUN | Board Member | — | ||
| SIMEONE TARTAGLIONE | Board Member | — | ||
| SALLY CORNELL | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA HECKERT | Board Member | — | ||
| STEVE GETTY | Board President | — | ||
| THOMAS ROCEK | Board Member | — | ||
| MIKKI SENN | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katherine Bostick | Business Manager | 10.2% of Rev | ||
| Carolyn Fuhrman | Board President | — | ||
| Polly Sierer | Board President | — | ||
| Susan Bartley | Treasurer | — | ||
| Ruthie Toole | Secretary | — | ||
| Bonnie McDonald | Programming Committee | — | ||
| Michael Smith | Grant Coordinator | — | ||
| Shao-Tang Sun | Board Member | — | ||
| Simeone Tartaglione | Board Member | — | ||
| Sally Cornell | Board President | — | ||
| Karen Rosenberg | Board President | — | ||
| Linda Heckert | Board Member | — | ||
| Steve Getty | Board Member | — | ||
| Thomas Rocek | Board Member | — | ||
| Mikki Senn | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simeone Tartaglione | Board Member | 19.1% of Rev | ||
| Roxanne Rust | Business Manager | 8.9% of Rev | ||
| Karen Rosenberg | Board President | — | ||
| Carolyn Fuhrman | Board President | — | ||
| Susan Bartley | Secretary | — | ||
| Fernando Serrano | Treasurer | — | ||
| Bonnie McDonald | Programming Committee | — | ||
| Deana Metten | Board Member | — | ||
| Russell Murray | Board Member | — | ||
| Niki Purdy | Board Member | — | ||
| Mikki Senn | Board Member | — | ||
| Scott Simpson | Grant Coordinator | — | ||
| Shao-Tang Sun | Board Member | — | ||
| Jack Bartley | Board President | — | ||
| Sally Cornell | Board President | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 23 other orgs in DE with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points above the peer median (75 vs. 34).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.