Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↑
Overall
36
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 1.2% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 2.5% 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 17.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 8.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 6.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 6.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 6.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 6.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 7.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 6.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMMA CALABRESE Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
SHERON THORP DOUCETTE Board President —
DAVID GAYLIN Treasurer —
JEAN-ALFRED CHAVIER Secretary —
WILLIAM A LAWLER Board Member —
BARBARA MOSS Board Member —
JONATHAN SMALL Board Member —
MARK SZPAK Board Member —
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member —
YO-EL CASSELL Board Member —
YOLANDA CELLUCCI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CARITY CONKEY Board President —
SEAN M HARRINGTON Secretary —
JONATHAN SMALL Board Member —
BARBARA MOSS Board Member —
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member —
DAVID GAYLIN Board Member —
BILL LAWLER Treasurer —
RAY CICCOLO Board Member —
MOLYNA RICHARDS Board Member —
MARK SZPAK Board Member —
CONNIE BRACELAND Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CARITY CONKEY Board President —
NICHOLAS L IACUZIO Treasurer —
CONNIE BRACELAND Board President —
SEAN M HARRINGTON Secretary —
SUSAN CARITY CONKEY Board President —
YOLANDA CELLUCCI Board Member —
NICHOLAS L IACUZIO Treasurer —
RAY CICCOLO Board Member —
CONNIE BRACELAND Board President —
THOMAS DUSEL Board Member —
SEAN M HARRINGTON Secretary —
JOHN C PEACOCK Board Member —
JONATHAN SMALL Board Member —
KEITH GILBERT Board Member —
RAY CICCOLO Board Member —
STACEY GALLAGHER-TULLY Board Member —
BARCLAY BENNETT Board Member —
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member —
BARBARA MOSS Board Member —
BILL LAWLER Board Member —
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member —
DAVID GAYLIN Board Member —
SUSAN CARITY CONKEY Board President —
NICHOLAS L IACUZIO Treasurer —
CONNIE BRACELAND Board President —
SEAN M HARRINGTON Secretary —
JONATHAN SMALL Board Member —
RAY CICCOLO Board Member —
BARCLAY BENNETT Board Member —
BARBARA MOSS Board Member —
BILL LAWLER Board Member —
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member —
DAVID GAYLIN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 50 points below the peer median (5 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.