Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
36
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 1.2% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 2.5% 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 17.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 8.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 6.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 6.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 6.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 6.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 7.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 6.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMMA CALABRESE Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
SHERON THORP DOUCETTE Board President
DAVID GAYLIN Treasurer
JEAN-ALFRED CHAVIER Secretary
WILLIAM A LAWLER Board Member
BARBARA MOSS Board Member
JONATHAN SMALL Board Member
MARK SZPAK Board Member
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member
YO-EL CASSELL Board Member
YOLANDA CELLUCCI Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CARITY CONKEY Board President
SEAN M HARRINGTON Secretary
JONATHAN SMALL Board Member
BARBARA MOSS Board Member
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member
DAVID GAYLIN Board Member
BILL LAWLER Treasurer
RAY CICCOLO Board Member
MOLYNA RICHARDS Board Member
MARK SZPAK Board Member
CONNIE BRACELAND Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CARITY CONKEY Board President
NICHOLAS L IACUZIO Treasurer
CONNIE BRACELAND Board President
SEAN M HARRINGTON Secretary
SUSAN CARITY CONKEY Board President
YOLANDA CELLUCCI Board Member
NICHOLAS L IACUZIO Treasurer
RAY CICCOLO Board Member
CONNIE BRACELAND Board President
THOMAS DUSEL Board Member
SEAN M HARRINGTON Secretary
JOHN C PEACOCK Board Member
JONATHAN SMALL Board Member
KEITH GILBERT Board Member
RAY CICCOLO Board Member
STACEY GALLAGHER-TULLY Board Member
BARCLAY BENNETT Board Member
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member
BARBARA MOSS Board Member
BILL LAWLER Board Member
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member
DAVID GAYLIN Board Member
SUSAN CARITY CONKEY Board President
NICHOLAS L IACUZIO Treasurer
CONNIE BRACELAND Board President
SEAN M HARRINGTON Secretary
JONATHAN SMALL Board Member
RAY CICCOLO Board Member
BARCLAY BENNETT Board Member
BARBARA MOSS Board Member
BILL LAWLER Board Member
MICHAEL COLOMBA Board Member
DAVID GAYLIN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (5 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.